Teams

Taconic Smash

2025 55&Over Women · 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-18vs DRC B55sLost 12
W#1 DoublesRika Tanous / Geeta Gorwara vs Valerie Gropper / Margaret Coughlan6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSuzanne McLeod / Robin Davis vs Yvonne Walker / Elizabeth Hammond6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobin Lois / Diane Ackley vs Dana Bol / Kelly Maloney5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-06vs DRC B55sWon 21
W#1 DoublesRika Tanous / Karen Ventosa vs Jennifer Corrado / Kelly Maloney6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRobin Lois / Geeta Gorwara vs Valerie Gropper / Yvonne Walker4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Leary / Nancy Yi vs Olga Simoncelli / Margaret Coughlan7-5, 2-1
2025-07-24vs Southern: MonroeWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne McLeod / Robin Davis vs Tracy Andrews / Marie Fredericks7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Ventosa / Rika Tanous vs Laura Brumbaugh / Judy Godfrey6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Cooper / Maria Hickey vs Sheila Reed / Margaret Pedziwiatr6-2, 6-1
2025-07-17vs DRC B55sWon 21
W#1 DoublesRika Tanous / Nancy Yi vs Kelly Maloney / Diana Regini6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristine Young / Susan Leary vs Margaret Coughlan / Valerie Gropper5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Lois / Maria Hickey vs Karen Rossi / Elizabeth Hammond6-3, 6-2
2025-07-09vs Southern: MonroeWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne McLeod / Robin Davis vs Tracy Andrews / Marie Fredericks7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRika Tanous / Susan Cooper vs Sheila Reed / Judy Godfrey6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobin Lois / Geeta Gorwara vs Laura Brumbaugh / Margaret Pedziwiatr7-5, 6-3
2025-06-20vs Southern: MonroeLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Leary / Rika Tanous vs Kristi Greco / Judy Godfrey4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Young / Diane Ackley vs Marie Fredericks / Tracy Andrews2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDora Perkes / Robin Davis vs Laura Brumbaugh / Margaret Pedziwiatr0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Taconic Smash069918154
2Southern: Monroe0610820154
3DRC B55s0681023186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Suzanne McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Susan Leary
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Rika Tanous
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Robin Lois
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Karen Ventosa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Christine Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Nancy Yi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Maria Hickey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Susan Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Diane Ackley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Dora Perkes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Geeta Gorwara
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Robin Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Cooper + Susan Leary3451% games+6.1% vs expected
Susan Cooper + Rika Tanous8359% games+4.9% vs expected
Rika Tanous + Karen Ventosa5165% games+3.8% vs expected
Geeta Gorwara + Rika Tanous4261% games+3.6% vs expected
Christine Young + Susan Leary51145% games+0.5% vs expected
Christine Young + Maria Hickey5163% games−2.7% vs expected
Rika Tanous + Susan Leary5551% games−2.8% vs expected
Suzanne McLeod + Susan Leary7258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Suzanne McLeod
164W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Susan Leary
116W–88L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Rika Tanous
128W–103L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Robin Lois
21W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Karen Ventosa
31W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Christine Young
66W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Nancy Yi
33W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Maria Hickey
136W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Susan Cooper
85W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
3
Diane Ackley
36W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Dora Perkes
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Geeta Gorwara
22W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Davis
15W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.