Teams

Le.Boesch18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-13vs Ne.Day18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesTanita Tedamrongwanish vs Anastasiya Manet4-6, 4-6
2025-07-06vs Ne.Day18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesPaula Collado Cordon vs Anastasiya Manet2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLeslie Boesch vs Nena Marks4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMaryBeth Jackson vs Laura Alvarez6-4, 6-2
2025-06-28vs Ne.Day18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesTanita Tedamrongwanish vs Nena Marks1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesMaryBeth Jackson vs Heather Remley6-1, 6-2
2025-06-22vs Ne.Day18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesPaula Collado Cordon vs Ivette Duran2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-08vs Ne.Day18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesLeslie Boesch vs Ivette Duran2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-01vs Ne.Day18SSplit 11
L#2 SinglesPaula Collado Cordon vs Nena Marks1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesTanita Tedamrongwanish vs Laura Alvarez6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Elizabeth Hodges
published
4.67
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 5
4.61
Emily Perry
published
4.51
MaryBeth Jackson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.46
Leslie Boesch
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.43
Paula Collado Cordon
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.37
Angelina Neiberger
published 4.5
4.32
Julia Howard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MaryBeth Jackson + Tanita Tedamrongwanish4257% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Boesch + MaryBeth Jackson3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Hodges
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
178W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.67
Emily Perry
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
4.5
MaryBeth Jackson
107W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.51
4.5
Leslie Boesch
243W–102L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
5
Paula Collado Cordon
64W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Angelina Neiberger
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
Julia Howard
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.