Teams

Hop.Pflaum55A

2026 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-23vs Ki.Lamb55A3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMelanie Waldron / LaDonna Lee vs Jeannette Walker / Kristen Gillispie7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Nuxoll / Laura Beaver vs Corinne Alavi / Christy van Ness6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Nixon / Ann Hahn vs Bethany Stempien / Elizabeth Pavese6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-16vs An.Redmond55ALost 12
L#1 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Stacy Grose vs Rossi Evans / Jennifer Silverberg1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Nuxoll / Laura Beaver vs Melissa Weber / Cheri Kivisto1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWendie Hill / Hope Pflaum vs Susan Starnes / Suzanne Ruggles6-2, 6-1
2026-04-09vs Mo.Garrell55ALost 12
L#1 DoublesLaDonna Lee / Stacy Grose vs Beth Pegram / Elena Ryzhikova3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Beaver / Linda Nuxoll vs Jan Copeland / Leanne Stradling6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Nixon / Hope Pflaum vs Denise Gold / Laura Edgerton2-6, 1-6
2026-04-08vs El.Zimmerman55AWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaDonna Lee / Dorothy Nance vs Christa Hochstrasser / Garnett Webb6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHope Pflaum / Stacy Grose vs Sarah Winstead / Rebecca Glendy6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWendie Hill / Linda Nuxoll vs DOROTHY BROWN / Kelly Zargo6-4, 6-1
2026-04-01vs An.Redmond55AWon 30
W#1 DoublesDorothy Nance / Laura Beaver vs Cheri Kivisto / Anne Redmond6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Karen Foster vs Stephanie Lee / Dawn Johnstone6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaDonna Lee / Hope Pflaum vs Susan Starnes / Dora Reed6-4, 6-2
2026-03-26vs Be.Robertson55AWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Waldron / Stacy Grose vs Michele Moore / Catherine Chavez6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Nixon / Cathy Marion vs Diana Kennedy / Tami Hollingsworth2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Beaver / Linda Nuxoll vs Michele Zaytoun / Grace Poole6-0, 6-1
2026-03-19vs Sh.Chapman55ALost 12
W#1 DoublesStacy Grose / Melanie Waldron vs Caroline Miller / Kelly Johnson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaDonna Lee / Karen Foster vs Rita Burgess / Michele Storr4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDorothy Nance / Ann Hahn vs Amber Bruner / Sandy Willey1-6, 0-6
2026-03-05vs Ki.Lamb55A3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Beaver / Melanie Waldron vs Dana Eaves / Kristen Gillispie6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Foster / Hope Pflaum vs Mary Lewis James / Teri Wallace6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Marion / Elisabeth Nixon vs Elizabeth Pavese / Mindy Hamlin7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1We.Sielaty55A3.09020719193
2Sh.Chapman55A8018614158
3Ca.Werder55A3.063171020194
4Vi.Dagit55A63151229252
5Da.Rusnak55A63141329242
6An.Redmond55A5315920186
7Ki.Lamb55A3.053121230236
8Be.Rubin55A54151229229
9Hop.Pflaum55A4415921194
10Te.Jones55A45161126244
11Ca.Zimmerman55A45151227223
12Su.Bowers55A45141332247
13Be.Robertson55A35111329214
14Mo.Garrell55A35111330234
15Ki.Roberts55A1852247302
16El.Zimmerman55A0822244288
17Ma.Springfield55A0942349303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Melanie Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.89
Laura Beaver
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
2.86
Dorothy Nance
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.81
Stacy Grose
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.79
Linda Nuxoll
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Ann Hahn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cathy Marion
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Hope Pflaum
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.73
LaDonna Lee
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.60
Wendie Hill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Elisabeth Nixon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hope Pflaum + Stacy Grose10654% games+8.6% vs expected
Linda Nuxoll + Laura Beaver314 matchesnot enough data
LaDonna Lee + Stacy Grose123 matchesnot enough data
Hope Pflaum + Linda Nuxoll303 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Grose + Melanie Waldron213 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Waldron + Dorothy Nance213 matchesnot enough data
Dorothy Nance + Laura Beaver213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Waldron
15W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Laura Beaver
8W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Dorothy Nance
7W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Stacy Grose
104W–74L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Linda Nuxoll
70W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Ann Hahn
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Cathy Marion
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Hope Pflaum
149W–101L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
LaDonna Lee
7W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Wendie Hill
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Elisabeth Nixon
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.