Teams

MC YELLOW

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-06vs MC GOLDLost 02
L#2 DoublesScott Kilpatrick / Robert Charles vs Mitchell Morrissey / Steve Fisher0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTim Lennek / Michael Martin vs Edward Kolb / John Henry3-6, 3-6
2024-07-30vs KC-RH GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Bradley / Robert Charles vs William Ross / Evan Ela6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTim Lennek / Michael Martin vs Terry Egert / Ken Lisi2-6, 1-6
2024-07-23vs DTC REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesStuart Adams / Tim Lennek vs Stephen Ehrlich / Bruce Fong1-6, 4-6
2024-07-09vs GTC GOLDLost 01
L#3 DoublesStuart Adams / Tim Lennek vs Ed Mooney / Paul Steiner1-6, 2-6
2024-07-02vs MC GOLDLost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Charles / Scott Kilpatrick vs Mitchell Morrissey / Steve Fisher6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Bradley / Jon Cram vs Roger Freeman / James Hull6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-25vs KC-RH GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesKishore Kulkarni / Robert Charles vs Ken Lisi / William Ross3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJon Cram / Scott Kilpatrick vs Terry Egert / Perry Christie6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStuart Adams / Tim Lennek vs David Brenner / Robert Kelly6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Robert Charles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Michael Martin
published
3.31
Jon Cram
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Tim Lennek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Stuart Adams
published
Kishore Kulkarni
published
Scott Kilpatrick
published
Walter Sulmeisters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Kilpatrick + Robert Charles123 matchesnot enough data
Scott Kilpatrick + Michael Martin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robert Charles
46W–56L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
Michael Martin
12W–27L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Jon Cram
55W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Tim Lennek
73W–103L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Stuart Adams
12W–45L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Kishore Kulkarni
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Kilpatrick
16W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Walter Sulmeisters
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.