Teams

Burkwood Poehler

2023 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Women · Richmond Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-02vs ACAC LindermanWon 10
W#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Frances Poehler vs Diane Linderman / Dawn MacHonis6-3, 6-0
2023-05-19vs Stonehenge SnavelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrances Poehler / Ellen Bedichek vs Terri Estes / Donna Bull6-1, 7-5
2023-05-12vs ACAC LarueLost 01
L#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Frances Poehler vs Virginia Nelson / Patricia Bell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-05vs Westwood SmithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Carolyn Shute vs Barbara Copley / Sheryl Highfill7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEllen Bedichek / Frances Poehler vs Claudia Williams / Janet Livick6-1, 6-3
2023-05-04vs MTC Reynolds 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Frances Poehler vs Sandra Farrow / Norma Kimbrel6-2, 6-0
2023-04-21vs Raintree DarlingWon 10
W#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Carolyn Shute vs Lorraine McGehee / Ruth Berens7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-14vs ACAC BartholomewWon 20
W#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Lynne Read vs Sandra Neumann / Judy Duke6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMarlene Zeigler / Frances Poehler vs Theresa Bartholomew / Susan Cheatham4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Frances Poehler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.33
Gail Russell
published
3.23
Virginia Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Ellen Bedichek
published
2.73
Carolyn Shute
published 3
Jane Durbin
published
Lynne Read
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Bowie + Frances Poehler11659% games+5.8% vs expected
Gail Russell + Frances Poehler3349% games−9.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Frances Poehler
120W–106L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Gail Russell
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Virginia Bowie
100W–71L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Ellen Bedichek
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Carolyn Shute
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Jane Durbin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynne Read
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.