Teams

Team 13 Cindy's Court Queens

2025 NOVA Singles · NOVA Singles 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-26vs Team 5 Love&Learn TennisLost 02
L#2 SinglesKamala Ismayilova vs Ryan Vaughn1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMaryam Nasimov vs Alina Sharafutdinova1-6, 2-6
2025-10-25vs Team 1 ZhaoLost 02
L#1 SinglesNitnoy Badgley vs Chenchen Feng2-6, 1-2
L#2 SinglesMaryam Nasimov vs Chloe Han2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Shannon Sikes
published
2.79
Nitnoy Badgley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Deborah Wright
published 3
2.74
Cindy Brault
published 3
2.47
Kamala Ismayilova
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.41
Maryam Nasimov
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maryam Nasimov + Kamala Ismayilova033 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Sikes + Nitnoy Badgley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Sikes
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Nitnoy Badgley
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Deborah Wright
2W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cindy Brault
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Kamala Ismayilova
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.47
Maryam Nasimov
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.