Teams

MSIL A65&O 6.0W Gregory-Bloomington

2023 Adult 65 & Over - West League · West MSIL 65 & Over 6.0W

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesCeleste Ames / Peggy Caslow vs Carol Csanda / Carol Deloriea6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Boblitt / Marlene Dewey vs Karen Magers / Dixie Raines6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCeleste Ames / Janet Hogan vs Jane Vaughn / Carol Csanda6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarcia Gregory / Kathleen Piatt vs Dana Miyat / Dixie Raines6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarlene Dewey / Carolyn Boblitt vs Jennie Hahn / Carol Deloriea6-0, 6-3
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Boblitt / Kathleen Piatt vs Jane Vaughn / Linda Louise Carps6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Lazarides / Cheryl Ellis vs Angela Roop-Lawler / Carol Deloriea7-6, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMarcia Gregory / Peggy Caslow vs Dana Miyat / Karen Magers6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Harmon / Pamela ZuHone vs Jane Vaughn / Linda Louise Carps4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Lazarides / Cheryl Ellis vs Linda Hill / Jennie Hahn6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeggy Caslow / Pamela ZuHone vs Angela Roop-Lawler / Judith Triggs6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesSusan Lazarides / Kathleen Piatt vs Dixie Raines / Karen Magers6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDeborah Harmon / Peggy Caslow vs Linda Louise Carps / Judith Triggs6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKay Lindsay / Pamela ZuHone vs Vicki Freeman / Linda Hill4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for West MSIL 65 & Over 6.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Peggy Caslow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Kay Lindsay
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.87
Carolyn Boblitt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Pamela ZuHone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Deborah Harmon
published 3
2.67
Celeste Ames
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cheryl Ellis
published 2.5
Janet Hogan
published
Kathleen Piatt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marcia Gregory
published
Marlene Dewey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Lazarides
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Harmon + Marcia Gregory5455% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Caslow + Celeste Ames123 matchesnot enough data
Peggy Caslow + Kay Lindsay303 matchesnot enough data
Janet Hogan + Celeste Ames213 matchesnot enough data
Janet Hogan + Carolyn Boblitt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Peggy Caslow
72W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Kay Lindsay
74W–125L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Carolyn Boblitt
83W–35L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
Pamela ZuHone
37W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Deborah Harmon
30W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Celeste Ames
55W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Cheryl Ellis
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Hogan
38W–32L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Piatt
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcia Gregory
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marlene Dewey
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Lazarides
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.