Teams

HOCO - Johnson

2025 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · 3.0 Women Day Friday

11 players · average NTRP / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-28vs MATA/Melissa JonesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStevie Rigby / Gracie Preston Rigby vs Elizabeth Herndon / Courtney Williams2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEvelyn Myrthil / Helen Nicholson vs Nancy Long / Mary Katz6-4, 6-3
2025-03-07vs MATA/Melissa JonesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGracie Preston Rigby / Francine Sauer vs Lori Prine / Courtney Williams4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStevie Rigby / Tashelga Parrott vs Ashley Thillainathan / Cathy Driver6-1, 6-0
2025-02-14vs MATA/Melissa JonesWon 10
W#2 SinglesStevie Rigby vs Valerie Ambrose2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Day Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Shannon Hankins
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Stacylee Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.00
Rachel Preston
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.99
Francine Sauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Stevie Rigby
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.90
Rolonda Gaskins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
MICHELLE BROWN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Tashelga Parrott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Evelyn Myrthil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Helen Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Gracie Preston Rigby
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Hankins + Francine Sauer10359% games+8.4% vs expected
Rolonda Gaskins + MICHELLE BROWN8654% games+4.7% vs expected
Helen Nicholson + Evelyn Myrthil314 matchesnot enough data
Stacylee Johnson + Rolonda Gaskins213 matchesnot enough data
Gracie Preston Rigby + Rachel Preston123 matchesnot enough data
Gracie Preston Rigby + Stevie Rigby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Hankins
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Stacylee Johnson
45W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Rachel Preston
43W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Francine Sauer
25W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Stevie Rigby
19W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Rolonda Gaskins
47W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
MICHELLE BROWN
48W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Tashelga Parrott
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
Evelyn Myrthil
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
Helen Nicholson
34W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Gracie Preston Rigby
22W–21L career · 10 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.