Teams

BMoreCha 9.0

2024 Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over · Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-17vs ONLY FANSLost 01
L#2 DoublesIan Hansen / Wendy Heger vs DONALD CRAWLEY / April Braxton7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-03vs ONLY FANSWon 10
W#3 DoublesWendy Heger / JJ Bonta vs Lucy Wang / Lukas Sanidas6-4, 6-4
2024-03-01vs ONLY FANSWon 10
W#2 DoublesWendy Heger / Henry Cha vs Luis Lozano / Jennifer Nyman0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-25vs ONLY FANSWon 10
W#1 DoublesKoby Bonta / Carol Besse vs DONALD CRAWLEY / Kaitlyn Heo6-3, 6-2
2024-02-16vs ONLY FANSWon 10
W#1 DoublesIan Hansen / Carol Besse vs Kyle Feeley / April Braxton6-4, 6-3
2024-02-04vs ONLY FANSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJJ Bonta / Wendy Heger vs KHOURY ZIAD / Simone Feldman6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIan Hansen / Carol Besse vs David Trang / Pamela Dean3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Ian Hansen
published
4.35
Koby Bonta
published
4.21
JJ Bonta
published
4.06
Carol Besse
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.03
Jean Lim
published
4.02
Kameron Harrison
published
4.01
Wendy Heger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.99
Michael Vaughan
published
3.94
Henry Cha
published
Elizabeth Larson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henry Cha + Jean Lim4842% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ian Hansen
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
4.45
Koby Bonta
28W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
4.35
JJ Bonta
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Carol Besse
288W–186L career · 5 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Jean Lim
18W–36L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
4.03
Kameron Harrison
3W–19L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Wendy Heger
140W–188L career · 4 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
Michael Vaughan
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.99
Henry Cha
25W–47L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
Elizabeth Larson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.