Teams

SFV-Calabasas Aces

SFV-SoCal Doubles-18 & Over · SFV - Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-13vs SFV-LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Fang-Putinier / Helina Wu vs Nancy Closson / Lorna Kim5-7, 3-6
2021-10-03vs SFV-TeamCorbinWon 10
W#2 DoublesHelina Wu / Janet Fang-Putinier vs Robin Hittelman / Yoko Miyasaki6-2, 7-5
2021-09-18vs SFV-2 Sets To LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Fang-Putinier / Helina Wu vs Ghazala Trotter / Vicki Levin4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-09-11vs SFV-Toluca Lake SwansWon 10
W#2 DoublesHelina Wu / Janet Fang-Putinier vs Aubrey Karr / Hannah Fasick6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Janet Fang-Putinier
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Miri Mizrahi
published
3.76
Helina Wu
published 4
3.69
Suzie Yamamoto
published
3.61
Mary Manix
published
3.56
Corrine Weiner
published 4
3.40
Pauline McLean
published 3.5
3.29
Amanda Saxe
published 3.5
3.29
Cindy Giammarrusco
published 3.5
3.00
Susan Friedman
published
2.87
Connie Benveniste
published 3.5
2.78
Joanne Carlsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Benveniste + Joanne Carlsen0518% games−16.5% vs expected
Corrine Weiner + Pauline McLean4645% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Giammarrusco + Pauline McLean2637% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Fang-Putinier
144W–70L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%33%67%
4.06
Miri Mizrahi
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Helina Wu
6W–12L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
Suzie Yamamoto
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Mary Manix
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Corrine Weiner
89W–108L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Pauline McLean
37W–71L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Amanda Saxe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Cindy Giammarrusco
44W–69L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Susan Friedman
9W–18L career · no lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Connie Benveniste
2W–21L career · no lines in 2021
83%17%<1%
2.87
Joanne Carlsen
4W–14L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.