Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40MX8.0B

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0

23 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Brian Heimbecker
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.11
Jay Saddler
published
4.01
Brooke Rahn
published 4.5
3.93
Rex Manseau
published
3.79
Ashok Anumandla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Unjin Choi
published
3.73
Rodney Wade
published
3.64
INSOO PARK
published
3.63
Patama Suvarnarat
published
3.61
Joni Bartlett
published
3.61
Tim Bergeson
published
3.55
Heather La France
published
3.53
Hilary Butler
published
3.52
Greg Riggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Michael Liebman
published
3.46
Hang O'Neill
published
3.34
Susan Edwards
published
3.30
Luz Diaz Arbelaez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Michelle Blake
published
3.17
Michael Zukin
published
Bob La France
published
Marsha Heimbecker
published
Savitha Anjanappa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

INSOO PARK + Unjin Choi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brian Heimbecker
367W–83L career · 9 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.29
Jay Saddler
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Brooke Rahn
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
Rex Manseau
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.93
4
Ashok Anumandla
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Unjin Choi
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Rodney Wade
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
INSOO PARK
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Patama Suvarnarat
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Joni Bartlett
13W–20L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
Tim Bergeson
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Heather La France
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Hilary Butler
15W–22L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Greg Riggs
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Michael Liebman
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Hang O'Neill
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Susan Edwards
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Luz Diaz Arbelaez
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Michelle Blake
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Michael Zukin
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Bob La France
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marsha Heimbecker
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Savitha Anjanappa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.