Teams

GomesBartonStalling/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-20vs Greiner-Mann/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesJen Stallings / Katherine Michalik vs LeighAnn Carlton / Mary Greiner6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTiffany Barton vs Linda Crawford6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Ladd / Lea Parks vs Libby Hicks / Annabel Sims2-6, 4-6
2024-11-18vs Maute/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesLaura Spurgin / Paola Martinez vs Meredith Buckner / Colbey Keele7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Mcclenagan vs Lilly Tams6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarolina Lyngh / Jen Stallings vs Amanda Niethammer / Ashtyn Wright6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTiffany Barton vs Chelsea Maute6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPearl Jhala / Katherine Michalik vs Mimi Rust / Heather Ridenour5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-04vs Henderson/KnoxvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesJenna Gomes / Laura Spurgin vs Jennifer Cada / Elizabeth Salsbery6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Mcclenagan vs Julia Connor6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Brumit / Carolina Lyngh vs Elizabeth Justus / Sarah Baker7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Michalik vs Suzanne Bond6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Reid / Lea Parks vs Anna Kizer / Julie Kizer2-6, 5-7
2024-10-28vs Bailey/KnoxvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesLaura Spurgin / Paola Martinez vs Leslie Lischer / Gina Hovis6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Mcclenagan vs Stephanie Wetherington6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPearl Jhala / Jackie Davis vs Jenny McGlothin / Joanne Latimer6-7
W#2 SinglesSarah Michalik vs Mitzi Bodie6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatherine Michalik / Carolina Lyngh vs Karen Bell / Natalie Rock4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-10-21vs Carswell-Monarch/KnoxvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesJenna Gomes / Paola Martinez vs Suzanne Carswell / Anna Monarch7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Ladd / Karli Campbell vs Sarah Dolan / Miryana Eichelberger2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEmily Mcclenagan vs Stephanie Schiding6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Fendley / Laura Brumit vs Amy McCleary / Michelle Russ1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Emily Mcclenagan
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.39
Tiffany Barton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Carolina Lyngh
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.38
Paola Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Laura Spurgin
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.14
Pearl Jhala
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.00
Sarah Michalik
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Jenna Gomes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Katherine Michalik
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Jen Stallings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Lea Parks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.79
Karli Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.65
Laura Brumit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Amy Fendley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lauren Ladd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paola Martinez + Laura Spurgin5069% games+15.8% vs expected
Pearl Jhala + Carolina Lyngh3353% games+10.2% vs expected
Pearl Jhala + Laura Spurgin5261% games+9.2% vs expected
Jenna Gomes + Carolina Lyngh4167% games+6.1% vs expected
Jenna Gomes + Emily Mcclenagan8163% games+0.9% vs expected
Laura Spurgin + Emily Mcclenagan2341% games+0.1% vs expected
Lea Parks + Jen Stallings224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Spurgin + Carolina Lyngh224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Mcclenagan
42W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Tiffany Barton
23W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Carolina Lyngh
48W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Paola Martinez
56W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Laura Spurgin
41W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Pearl Jhala
43W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Sarah Michalik
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jenna Gomes
40W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Katherine Michalik
35W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
Jen Stallings
22W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Lea Parks
21W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Karli Campbell
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Laura Brumit
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Amy Fendley
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.41
Lauren Ladd
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.