Teams

Simmons-ICC

2026 Mixed 40 & Over-DLT · 3.5 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-25vs AdamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJ Hale / Beverly Hale vs Raymond Emerson / Leigh Street2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Landwirth / Vickie L Dodd vs Floyd Trammell / Susan Adams2-6, 1-6
2026-06-22vs AdamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Simmons / Vickie L Dodd vs Jared Busick / Leigh Street1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Landwirth / Brenda Lott vs Jeremy Foster / Tracy Etheridge0-6, 0-6
2026-06-09vs AdamsLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Lyon / Brenda Lott vs Brian Andrus / Robin Toler1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLee Simmons / Paula Simmons vs Paul Ashford / Susan Adams1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Landwirth / Kay Pitts vs Raymond Emerson / Leigh Street1-6, 0-6
2026-06-03vs AdamsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaul Lyon / Vickie L Dodd vs Floyd Trammell / Tracy Etheridge4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Landwirth / Brenda Lott vs Brian Andrus / Vicki Lindsay1-6, 0-6
2026-05-27vs AdamsLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaula Simmons / Lee Simmons vs Jeremy Foster / Diane Chenault1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Landwirth / Paula Wells vs Robin Toler / Jared Busick1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Hale / J Hale vs Susan Adams / Paul Ashford1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Simmons-ICC0511429175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Kay Pitts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Brenda Lott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.76
Paul Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Vickie L Dodd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Beverly Hale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
David Landwirth
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.62
Paula Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
J Hale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joel Wells
published
Lee Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kay Pitts
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Brenda Lott
20W–14L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
43%56%<1%
3.02
Paul Lyon
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Vickie L Dodd
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.75
3
Beverly Hale
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
David Landwirth
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Paula Simmons
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
J Hale
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Joel Wells
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lee Simmons
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.