Teams

BC-MiraCosta/KarieLanterman

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesIngrid Leon vs Sonja Farmer6-1, 6-2
2021-05-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesIngrid Leon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-16vs BC-SouthEnd/VanessaHyttenbergLost 01
L#1 SinglesKarie Lanterman vs Vanessa Hyttenberg1-6, 3-6
2021-05-02vs BC-LLW-MCC/JoyHuffmanLost 01
L#2 SinglesSharon Alston vs Amy Eastman1-6, 2-6
2021-04-25vs BC-WestEnd/TerriDiamondWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharon Alston / Valerie Starr vs Cindy Mularz / Kay Cotter6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-18vs BC-MCC/AnneDeMartiniLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarie Lanterman / Ingrid Leon vs Ashley Hansen / Christine Cronin1-6, 3-6
2021-04-03vs BC-SouthEnd/VanessaHyttenbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Alston / Katherine Rice vs Linda Snyder / Brenda Patron Kodani6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Darin Nizich
published 3.5
2.83
Deborah Russell
published 3
2.76
Katherine Rice
published
Hillary Curley
published 3
2.74
Ingrid Leon
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Sharon Alston
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Karie Lanterman
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.67
Soo Fujishige
published
2.65
Anne Umamoto
published 3
2.65
Vickie Chen
published
Lynn Attig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ingrid Leon + Karie Lanterman151649% games−1.6% vs expected
Katherine Rice + Sharon Alston3546% games−11.2% vs expected
Ingrid Leon + Sharon Alston3746% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darin Nizich
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Deborah Russell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
Katherine Rice
9W–12L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Hillary Curley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Ingrid Leon
73W–128L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Sharon Alston
48W–58L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Karie Lanterman
137W–186L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Soo Fujishige
15W–13L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Anne Umamoto
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
Vickie Chen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lynn Attig
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.