Teams

Le.Corn55C

2024 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-07vs De.Collins55CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWendy Brooker / Susan Hembarsky vs Jamie Kerzner / Aliza Bricklin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Flanagan / Leslie Corn vs Alacia Billow / Suzanne Turnburke6-4, 6-1
2024-09-30vs An.Pfeiffer55CLost 02
L#2 DoublesLeslie Corn / Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk vs Julie Fleming / Tiffany Harris1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTracey Carlin / Sherry Ingle vs Andrea Pfeiffer / Dana Weiland6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-23vs Le.Magee55CLost 02
L#2 DoublesLeslie Corn / Sherry Ingle vs Leigh Magee / Sarah Schmalz3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Hembarsky / Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk vs Susanne Knowles / Ann Willard5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-09vs Ta.LeFevre55C7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie Corn / Regina Heroux vs Andrea McCartney / Julie Dougherty1-6, 1-6
2024-09-08vs Ca.Conzola55C7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Corn / Daphne Driscoll vs Anneliese Carr / Gillian Kelleher3-6, 2-6
2024-08-30vs An.Pfeiffer55CWon 20
W#2 DoublesTracey Carlin / Susan Hembarsky vs Kathleen Tsibulsky / Averil Glover6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Corn / Daphne Driscoll vs Tiffany Harris / Stephanie Rabby6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-26vs Ja.Terrell55CLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoyce Lake / Leslie Corn vs Cassie Fuller / Rebecca Procter6-7, 4-6
2024-08-05vs Le.Magee55CWon 20
W#1 DoublesRegina Heroux / Leslie Corn vs Shelly Schiff / Ann Willard6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoyce Lake / Susan Hembarsky vs Heidi Duggins / Suzanne Wagner2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Tracey Carlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.27
Sherry Ingle
published
3.22
3.18
Susan Hembarsky
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Leslie Corn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Joyce Lake
published
Laurie Randall
published
Regina Heroux
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Corn + Susan Hembarsky121151% games−2.1% vs expected
Tracey Carlin + Susan Hembarsky7172% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Ingle + Susan Hembarsky224 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Corn + Tracey Carlin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tracey Carlin
154W–108L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Sherry Ingle
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Susan Hembarsky
101W–133L career · 9 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Leslie Corn
93W–72L career · 8 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Joyce Lake
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Laurie Randall
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Regina Heroux
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.