Teams

NR Tri-some

2026 Socal Tri-Level Mixed 18 & Over- Ventura · Ventura High Tri Level Mixed -(4.5,4.0,3.5)

13 players · average NTRP 3.81 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 upcoming
Sep 13 11:00 AM
vs
Rancho Madera Park
Sep 21 5:00 AM
vs
North Ranch Country Club
Sep 28 5:00 AM
vs
Mission Oaks Park
Oct 11 10:30 AM
vs
North Ranch Country Club
Oct 12 5:00 AM
vs
Rancho Madera Park
Oct 25 10:30 AM
vs
North Ranch Country Club
Nov 1 3:00 PM
vs
Rancho Madera Park
Nov 2 5:00 AM
vs
North Ranch Country Club
Nov 15 9:30 AM
vs
Valle Lindo Park
Flight standings4 teams · Ventura High Tri Level Mixed -(4.5,4.0,3.5)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mixed Troubles000000
2NR Tri-some000000
3Drop a Deuce000000
4Wood Ranch Alley Cats Tri000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Brant Benun
published 4.5
4.35
Jackson Ellis
published
3.97
Jordan Riessen
published
3.82
Sandy Hutchins
published
Bob Benton
published 4
3.74
Diane Merade
published 4
3.66
Brian Forster
published 4
3.53
Danielle Crawford
published 3.5
3.33
Liat Ciardi
published 3.5
3.28
Adam Targum
published 3.5
3.04
Beth Benton
published 3.5
Keith Stanley
published
Tricia Stanley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brant Benun + Beth Benton4250% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Hutchins + Jordan Riessen303 matchesnot enough data
Diane Merade + Jordan Riessen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brant Benun
17W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
4.48
Jackson Ellis
37W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
Jordan Riessen
14W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
Sandy Hutchins
14W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Bob Benton
15W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Diane Merade
9W–19L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Brian Forster
8W–21L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Danielle Crawford
25W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Liat Ciardi
204W–176L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Adam Targum
19W–17L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Beth Benton
11W–15L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Keith Stanley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tricia Stanley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.