Teams

Pinellas/Pasinski/18&Over8.5M

2023 Pinellas Combo 18 & Over Summer · 8.5 M Saturday

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-19vs SPTC The Hit SquadLost 12
L#1 DoublesDane Houston / Mike Moenter vs Nick Phelps / Steven Dominie3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChris Eversole / Robert Maisner vs NICHOLAS INNISS / Tyler Murphy7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMonty Johnson / Michael Purvis vs Clark MacCullough / Mohamed Aboul-Ezz2-6, 0-6
2023-08-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Polak / Dane Houston vs Nick Phelps / Jack Willett5-7, 3-6
2023-08-05vs SPTC The Hit SquadLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Maisner / Monty Johnson vs Nick Phelps / Rob Perry3-6, 4-6
2023-07-29vs SPTC The Hit SquadLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Moenter / Dane Houston vs Antonio Williams / Rob Perry3-6, 0-6
2023-07-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Purvis / Monty Johnson vs Antonio Williams / Steven Dominie7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-07-18vs SPTC The Hit SquadWon 20
W#1 DoublesMike Moenter / Dane Houston vs Rob Perry / Antonio Williams6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Maisner / David Palmer vs Jack Willett / Pedro Franco Byrne4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-13vs SPTC The Hit SquadWon 10
W#3 DoublesMonty Johnson / Brian Polak vs Antonio Williams / Rob Perry1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Ray Pasinski
published
4.11
Mike Moenter
published
3.90
Brian Hodapp
published 4
3.90
David Palmer
published 4
3.83
Monty Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Chris Eversole
published 4
3.59
Dane Houston
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Robert Maisner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Palmer + Brian Hodapp7162% games+1.8% vs expected
Robert Maisner + Dane Houston4257% gamesnot enough data
Monty Johnson + Dane Houston044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ray Pasinski
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
Mike Moenter
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.11
4
Brian Hodapp
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
David Palmer
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Monty Johnson
134W–108L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Chris Eversole
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dane Houston
155W–186L career · 6 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Robert Maisner
59W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.