Teams

Eastern/Tohmatsu/18&Over4.5W

2023 18&Over Women Manhattan · 4.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 4.50 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-18vs Bruzat/FeldmanWon 32
L#1 DoublesAmy Untch / Hiroko Hayashi vs Hanna Feldman / Amelie Bruzat5-7, 4-4
W#1 SinglesHelga Roth vs Rachel Weiss6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKuntal Joshi / Huan Zhou vs Katie Cirella / Lisa Frantz6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLuzan Moore vs Skyler Simson4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLindsey Chin / Leslie Chen vs Sheridan Scholtz / Federica Tollini6-0, 6-1
2023-06-22vs Bruzat/FeldmanWon 32
L#1 DoublesAmy Untch / Akiko Tohmatsu vs Hanna Feldman / Julie Veto2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMaria Salnikowa vs Katie Cirella6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanine Sadaka / Huan Zhou vs Amelie Bruzat / Lisa Frantz6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesVidushi Bhargava vs Jamie Weiss0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHiroko Hayashi / Leslie Chen vs Sheridan Scholtz / Federica Tollini6-2, 7-6
2023-06-05vs Pflaumer/BonadonnaWon 32
W#1 DoublesAmy Untch / Rose Schlecker vs Mehves Kocak-Elci / Stacy Fleischman6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesVidushi Bhargava vs Charisse Winthrop7-5, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrittney Eady / Kuntal Joshi vs Joanne Persico / Erin Anderson Katzman6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesHelga Roth vs Kristen Cassidy6-7, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAkiko Tohmatsu / Hiroko Hayashi vs Kim Pflaumer / Alyssa Bonadonna6-2, 6-3
2023-05-22vs Bruzat/FeldmanWon 50
W#1 DoublesAmy Untch / Rose Schlecker vs Lindsay Jadow / Rachel Weiss6-1, 6-7
W#1 SinglesHelga Roth vs Hanna Feldman6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAkiko Tohmatsu / Kuntal Joshi vs Katie Cirella / Skyler Simson6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesLuzan Moore vs Julie Veto6-4, 5-3
W#3 DoublesHuan Zhou / Lindsey Chin vs Jacqueline Vazquez / Sheridan Scholtz6-2, 6-0
2023-05-07vs Pflaumer/BonadonnaWon 32
W#1 DoublesCaroline Coleman / Courtney Kilarski vs Stacy Fleischman / Charisse Winthrop0-6, 6-5
L#1 SinglesVidushi Bhargava vs Kristen Cassidy6-7, 4-4
L#2 DoublesBrittney Eady / Akiko Tohmatsu vs Katie Figgie / Sondra Glueck2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHelga Roth vs Francesca Roth3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLindsey Chin / Huan Zhou vs Pam Sorin / Erin Anderson Katzman6-4, 6-0
2023-05-03vs Bruzat/FeldmanWon 50
W#1 DoublesAmy Untch / Ashley Lessen vs Julie Veto / Katie Cirella6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMaria Salnikowa vs Jamie Pine6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCaroline Coleman / Courtney Kilarski vs Hanna Feldman / Jacqueline Vazquez6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesHelga Roth vs Jamie Weiss4-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLindsey Chin / Akiko Tohmatsu vs Kathy Rey / MacKinna Hart6-2, 6-2
2023-04-19vs Pflaumer/BonadonnaWon 41
W#1 DoublesAmy Untch / Rose Schlecker vs Kim Pflaumer / Katie Figgie6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMaria Salnikowa vs Kristen Cassidy7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJanine Sadaka / Kuntal Joshi vs Diann Starcke / Gina Hagedorn6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesVidushi Bhargava vs Francesca Roth3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHuan Zhou / Brittney Eady vs Sondra Glueck / Susan Bacey6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pflaumer/Bonadonna06101737292
2Eastern/Tohmatsu/18&Over4.5W0723719245
3Bruzat/Feldman07122147338

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Rose Schlecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
Huan Zhou
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Amy Untch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Diana Davis
published 4.5
Hiroko Hayashi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Janine Sadaka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Brittney Eady
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Kuntal Joshi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Lindsey Chin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Luzan Moore
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.07
Helga Roth
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.06
Ashley Lessen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.90
Vidushi Bhargava
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.65
Lola Fadulu
published
Akiko Tohmatsu
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Caroline Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Courtney Kilarski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Leslie Chen
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Maria Salnikowa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Schlecker + Amy Untch13169% games+16.8% vs expected
Kuntal Joshi + Brittney Eady5259% games+7.2% vs expected
Kuntal Joshi + Amy Untch15759% games+6.6% vs expected
Lindsey Chin + Huan Zhou6360% games+3.8% vs expected
Amy Untch + Huan Zhou6360% games−2.4% vs expected
Kuntal Joshi + Huan Zhou8358% games−3.4% vs expected
Amy Untch + Brittney Eady5251% games−5.1% vs expected
Kuntal Joshi + Janine Sadaka4151% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rose Schlecker
46W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Huan Zhou
125W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Amy Untch
128W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Diana Davis
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Hiroko Hayashi
58W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Janine Sadaka
33W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Brittney Eady
117W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
Kuntal Joshi
69W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
Lindsey Chin
36W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
Luzan Moore
35W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Helga Roth
12W–6L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Ashley Lessen
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.06
Vidushi Bhargava
23W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.90
Lola Fadulu
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.65
Akiko Tohmatsu
21W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Caroline Coleman
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Courtney Kilarski
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Chen
25W–6L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Salnikowa
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.