Teams

Bracken/FS/CM

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-12vs Mullens/FS/BGWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngelica Hernandez / Kathryn Rogers vs Sharon Guzman / Erin Barker6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSally Bracken / Cynthia Bushnaq vs Wendy Mullens / Emma Robertson3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeanette Mccain / Jennifer Hurst vs Emily Knoll / Monique Bracken6-0, 6-1
2026-05-12vs Mullens/FS/BGWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanette Mccain / Jennifer Hurst vs Emily Knoll / Annette Summers6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Blatt / Cynthia Bushnaq vs Mitzi Efurd / Monique Bracken6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSally Bracken / Kathryn Rogers vs Wendy Mullens / Sharon Guzman2-6, 3-6
2026-05-12vs Mullens/FS/BGSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSally Bracken / Kathryn Rogers vs Emma Robertson / Erin Barker6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeanette Mccain / Cynthia Bushnaq vs Wendy Mullens / Sharon Guzman2-6, 4-6
2026-04-01vs Mullens/FS/BGWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanette Mccain / Jennifer Hurst vs Whitney Marcotte / Emily Knoll6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShannon Blatt / Kathryn Rogers vs Monique Bracken / Mitzi Efurd6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSally Bracken / Angelica Hernandez vs Wendy Mullens / Emma Robertson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-14vs Mullens/FS/BGWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeanette Mccain / Jennifer Hurst vs Mitzi Efurd / Annette Summers6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShannon Blatt / Angelica Hernandez vs Emma Robertson / Jacie Hamby7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSally Bracken / Cynthia Bushnaq vs Emily Knoll / Whitney Marcotte7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bracken/FS/CM4110515123
2Mullens/FS/BG1451021140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Kathryn Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.42
Liz Jumper
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Jennifer Hurst
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Angelica Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.27
Jeanette Mccain
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.25
Sally Bracken
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.13
Shannon Blatt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Cynthia Bushnaq
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Hurst + Jeanette Mccain404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Rogers
4W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.75
Liz Jumper
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Jennifer Hurst
10W–3L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Angelica Hernandez
9W–9L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Jeanette Mccain
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Sally Bracken
13W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Shannon Blatt
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Cynthia Bushnaq
3W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.