Teams

Lucky tennis

2026 CVTA Weekday Women's Spring League · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 tri format

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 tri format have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Marie Mercer-Lewis
published
3.40
Lucky Chan
published
3.37
Annette Poole
published 3.5
3.25
Regina Hicks
published
2.75
Clyde Spivey
published 3
2.75
Martha Millican
published
2.67
Donna Atkins
published 3
2.60
Lisa Wheat
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marie Mercer-Lewis
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Lucky Chan
29W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Annette Poole
10W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
Regina Hicks
37W–35L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Clyde Spivey
16W–13L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.75
Martha Millican
14W–14L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Donna Atkins
18W–34L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
Lisa Wheat
13W–20L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.