Teams

Duval/Kane/18&Over6.5W

2024 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Women Summer · 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-08-24vs San Jose Lions (Wise)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Kathleen Muldoon / Amy Christy vs Michelle Kalil / Meg Sheffield7-5, 6-3
2024-08-10vs Jax Golf - CarbonneauWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Christy / Lindsey Smith vs Terri Holmes / Annie DeStefano2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Amy Buckley
published 4
3.44
Beth Kane
published 4
3.44
3.30
Katie Culp
published
3.29
Nonie McVicker
published
3.24
Tammy Morreale
published
3.22
Elizabeth Smith
published
3.13
Nancy Simmons
published
3.09
Amy Christy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Ginger Vanderheyden
published
2.97
Renee' Kirkland
published
2.85
2.85
Ashli Nixon
published 3
Lindsey Smith
published
Mary Glyn Denning
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Kane + Amy Buckley3250% games−8.9% vs expected
Tammy Morreale + Katie Culp404 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Vanderheyden + Elizabeth Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Vanderheyden + Renee' Kirkland033 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Vanderheyden + Tammy Morreale123 matchesnot enough data
Nonie McVicker + Tammy Morreale213 matchesnot enough data
Renee' Kirkland + Beth Kane213 matchesnot enough data
Renee' Kirkland + Mary Kathleen Muldoon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Buckley
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Beth Kane
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Mary Kathleen Muldoon
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Katie Culp
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
Nonie McVicker
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Tammy Morreale
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.24
Elizabeth Smith
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Nancy Simmons
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
3.5
Amy Christy
33W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
Ginger Vanderheyden
4W–19L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Renee' Kirkland
14W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Anne Marie Cushmac
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Ashli Nixon
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
Lindsey Smith
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Glyn Denning
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.