Teams

Haag/18/7.5/CM/UClub

2026 BR Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 7.5 BR (18&O) Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Sep 15 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Shane Haag
Sep 22 6:30 PM
University Club Baton Rouge
Sep 29 6:30 PM
University Club Baton Rouge
Oct 6 6:30 PM
Southern Oaks Athletic Club
2026-09-01vs Ragusa/18/7.5/CM/SOACLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephen Swiber / Pablo Riedemann vs Paul Ragusa / Jacob Chapman6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Hershey / Andrew Rabalais vs Cameron Hart / Stephen Politz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChandler Courreges / Kyle McDowell vs Matthew Baggett / DEREK MICHELL5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-18vs Martin/18/7.5/CM/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Farrell / Jon Eenigenburg vs Parker Delatte / Alexander Do6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephen Swiber / Matthew Breaux vs Hayden Dudley / Lawson Clegg7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDan Gardiner / Ryan Kinsley vs Nathan Nguyen / Tom Crowell6-2, 6-2
2026-08-11vs Ligh/18/7.5/CM/BRECWon 21
W#1 DoublesBradley Allen / Ryan Farrell vs Eddie Weeks / Marshall LaMoyne6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Rabalais / Chandler Courreges vs Herb Fong / Tyler Busby6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTimothy Kwan / Benjamin Hershey vs Ben Terral / Rodney Terral6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-28vs Pham/18/7.5/CM/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesDan Gardiner / Pablo Riedemann vs Vincent Nguyen / Garland Lundy6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKyle McDowell / Ryan Kinsley vs Thach Nguyen / Matthew Wood6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTeche Melancon / Benjamin Hershey vs Don Zhang / David Bolton6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.5 BR (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Haag/18/7.5/CM/UClub3081370
2Martin/18/7.5/CM/BREC21451188
3Ragusa/18/7.5/CM/SOAC1133755
4Ligh/18/7.5/CM/BREC12541295
5Pham/18/7.5/CM/BREC031817105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jon Eenigenburg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Dan Gardiner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Ryan Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Teche Melancon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Andrew Rabalais
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Stephen Swiber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Kyle McDowell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Matthew Breaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Ryan Kinsley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.57
Robert Newton
published
3.56
Benjamin Hershey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.53
Pablo Riedemann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Bill Jackson
published 3.5
3.44
Shane Haag
published
3.42
Chandler Courreges
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Alex Lewis
published 3.5
Timothy Kwan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Farrell + Jon Eenigenburg4160% games−2.7% vs expected
Shane Haag + Bill Jackson404 matchesnot enough data
Alex Lewis + Kyle McDowell314 matchesnot enough data
Alex Lewis + Bill Jackson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Eenigenburg
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.98
4
Dan Gardiner
21W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Ryan Farrell
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Teche Melancon
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Andrew Rabalais
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Stephen Swiber
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.72
Kyle McDowell
24W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
Matthew Breaux
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
Ryan Kinsley
47W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
Robert Newton
1W–10L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Benjamin Hershey
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
Pablo Riedemann
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Bill Jackson
36W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Shane Haag
20W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Chandler Courreges
28W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Alex Lewis
33W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Timothy Kwan
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.