Teams

TCU CARTER

2024 FW Ladies 55 & Over winter · Sat 7.0 Ladies

18 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Sat 7.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Beth Grimes
published 4
3.49
Jan McKean
published
3.48
Sue Walker
published
3.46
Summer Richbourg
published
3.41
Joan Lawson
published
3.37
Sharon Christmas
published
3.26
Tracey Wood-Sanford
published
3.24
Meg Pope
published
3.19
Mary McKee
published
3.16
Darci Miklos
published 3.5
3.01
Tricia Spann
published
2.92
Denise Cardenas
published 3
2.91
Sally Joslin
published
2.68
Cynthia Carter
published 3
2.61
Jo Anne Golaz
published
Derya Gumuser
published
Kari Jordan
published
Susan Appling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Summer Richbourg + Jan McKean11162% games+5.7% vs expected
Summer Richbourg + Mary McKee314 matchesnot enough data
Meg Pope + Tricia Spann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Grimes
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jan McKean
62W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Sue Walker
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Summer Richbourg
60W–32L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
Joan Lawson
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Sharon Christmas
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
Tracey Wood-Sanford
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Meg Pope
10W–30L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.24
Mary McKee
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Darci Miklos
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
Tricia Spann
28W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Denise Cardenas
19W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Sally Joslin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Cynthia Carter
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Jo Anne Golaz
25W–48L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
Derya Gumuser
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kari Jordan
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Appling
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.