Teams

Bethpage, Zuch/Mao

2026 55&Over Women Night · 7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.62 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-24vs Kings Park, Kolomick/WilkinsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Brennan / Arlene Pickus vs Michelle Cimetta / Rhonda Dauway6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnnette Delgado / Karen Massa vs Maria Kalonaros / Suzanne ODonoghue6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTeri Mariani / Kathy Dennis vs Deborah Kolomick / Lisa Reuben6-1, 6-4
2026-08-17vs Bethpage, FlanaganWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Mao / Valsey Bartley vs Melanie Seger / Wendy Stechman3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnnette Delgado / Karen Massa vs Gigi Banks / Tara Ofsink6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Hermann / Sharon Zuch vs Shanon Blue / Maureen Bonanno6-1, 6-2
2026-08-04vs Carefree, Wei Chen/AvilesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeri Mariani / Diana Scheinberg vs Linda Or / He Qing6-3, 6-2
2026-07-15vs Bethpage, FlanaganWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnnette Delgado / Karen Massa vs Francine Zinerco / Deborah Drillman6-3, 6-2
2026-07-08vs Blue Point, MazzaroneWon 10
W#2 DoublesTeri Mariani / Diana Scheinberg vs Zsuzsa Price / Jill Block6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2026-07-01vs Kings Park, Kolomick/WilkinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesTraci Stevenson / Gina Muratore vs Deborah Kolomick / Lisa Reuben6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Barnola / Karen Massa vs Julia Mermelstein / Maria Kalonaros6-0, 6-4
2026-06-03vs Blue Point, MazzaroneLost 01
L#2 DoublesGina Muratore / Kathie McDermott-Greene vs Zsuzsa Price / Jill Block4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Annette Delgado
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.72
Ann Marie Cosma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Julie Barnola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Laurie Schoenfeld
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Valsey Bartley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Kathie McDermott-Greene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Cynthia Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Jennifer Mao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Diana Scheinberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Teri Mariani
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Traci Stevenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Sharon Zuch
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Arlene Pickus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Gina Muratore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Jane Whearty
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Karen Hermann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Massa
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Dennis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Stevenson + Laurie Schoenfeld41243% games+3.5% vs expected
Ann Marie Cosma + Annette Delgado6356% games+3.3% vs expected
Jane Whearty + Ann Marie Cosma10260% games+3.3% vs expected
Arlene Pickus + Sharon Zuch6356% games+2.8% vs expected
Jane Whearty + Sharon Zuch6548% games+2.6% vs expected
Teri Mariani + Diana Scheinberg4156% games+1.6% vs expected
Jennifer Mao + Valsey Bartley5153% games+0.3% vs expected
Julie Barnola + Sharon Zuch424750% games−1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annette Delgado
253W–180L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Ann Marie Cosma
85W–75L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Julie Barnola
101W–91L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Laurie Schoenfeld
109W–127L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Valsey Bartley
120W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Kathie McDermott-Greene
168W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Cynthia Brennan
35W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Jennifer Mao
144W–91L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Diana Scheinberg
47W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Teri Mariani
83W–79L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Traci Stevenson
134W–207L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Sharon Zuch
108W–107L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Arlene Pickus
36W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Gina Muratore
80W–95L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Jane Whearty
83W–86L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Karen Hermann
24W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Massa
20W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Dennis
10W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.