Teams

Julington Creek - Berman

2026 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-13vs Oakleaf - TaylorLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Teresa Hulshult vs Jennifer Osbeck / Rachelle Stewart1-6, 1-6
2026-06-07vs Harbour Island - AllanWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Berman / Vanessa Viera vs Ashley Berg / Mary Tucker6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJulie Clampitt vs Heather Adkins0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Hendricks / Angie Lively vs Tonya Kern-Honea / Jan Peaver6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGina Betbeze / Leslie de Jong vs Lauren Joyce / Barbara Neville7-5, 6-1
2026-05-31vs Duval/CutajLost 01
L#3 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Janet Gibson vs Lois Andrada-De la Cruz / Jennifer Cremen3-6, 5-7
2026-05-24vs Timuquana - LovelaceSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Berman / Becky Argalas vs Emily Painter / Katherine Kidd2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Karolak vs Rachael Shad4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Hendricks / Gina Betbeze vs Isabelle Milne / KATHERINE FORRESTER6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Janet Gibson vs Suzanne Burhyte / Anna McKenzie3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-17vs Southside - BerryLost 01
L#3 DoublesGale Joy / Teresa Hulshult vs Shari Shuman / Lynn Bledsoe4-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs San Jose - WinslowWon 32
W#1 DoublesKaren Berman / Vanessa Viera vs Laurie Scott / Allison Wise7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnna Neal vs Natasha Eliz1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Hendricks / Gina Betbeze vs Kathryn Dickey / Julie Boone6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMichelle Karolak vs Anna Valent6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGale Joy / Valerie Markham vs Jessica Mills / Carmel Buchanan6-4, 6-3
2026-05-03vs Deerwood - BlockWon 31
W#1 DoublesBecky Argalas / Vanessa Viera vs Jill Evans / Sayra Sievert7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnna Neal vs Sheri Goldstein6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Hendricks / Heather Storey vs Melissa Ryan / Carrie West6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanet Gibson / Angie Lively vs Christine Block / Susan Whiteside3-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs The Woods - TracyLost 23
L#1 DoublesVanessa Viera / Becky Argalas vs Victoria Miller / Angie Talbott4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnna Neal vs Amy Edwards6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Gale Joy vs Rosy Culpepper / Rebecca Akridge2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJulie Clampitt vs Christine Creveling1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMegan Hendricks / Heather Storey vs Vicky Lane / Jeri Tracy6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Anna Neal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Vanessa Viera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Angie Lively
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Gina Betbeze
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Heather Storey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Becky Argalas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Megan Hendricks
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Karen Berman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Janet Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Michelle Karolak
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.07
Valerie Markham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Teresa Hulshult
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Gale Joy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Julie Clampitt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Leslie de Jong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Storey + Megan Hendricks2350% games+2.3% vs expected
Karen Berman + Vanessa Viera2342% games−4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Neal
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38
Vanessa Viera
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Angie Lively
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Gina Betbeze
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Heather Storey
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Becky Argalas
2W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Megan Hendricks
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Karen Berman
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Janet Gibson
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
Michelle Karolak
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Valerie Markham
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Teresa Hulshult
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Gale Joy
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Julie Clampitt
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Leslie de Jong
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.