Teams

QRRC Taylor

2025 OH OV FALL A18&O Weekend · Fall 4.0 Men Dayton

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-09-22vs KTC ComptonLost 14
L#1 DoublesAnthony Taylor / Edward McCall vs Andrew Schulz / Jim Minard6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBryan Ulery vs GOBINATH BALASUBRAMANIAN0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDylan Donaldson / Greg Haack vs John Hauk / Kyle Nagel6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEric Holterman vs Chris Compton1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKevin Fraker / Kevin Weaver vs Brooks Compton / Jason Matthews6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall 4.0 Men Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anthony Taylor
published 4
3.72
Greg Haack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Owen Massarelli
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.55
Dylan Donaldson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.54
Edward McCall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kyle Webb
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.49
Kevin Fraker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Eric Holterman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Jansen Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Bryan Ulery
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Kevin Weaver
published
Mark Beckdahl
published
Mason Pierri
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Phillip Pierri
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jansen Meyers + Greg Haack5160% games+11.9% vs expected
Kyle Webb + Jansen Meyers181453% games+4.5% vs expected
Kyle Webb + Greg Haack6160% games+3.3% vs expected
Edward McCall + Kevin Weaver4549% games−1.9% vs expected
Kevin Fraker + Bryan Ulery3350% games−5.0% vs expected
Kevin Weaver + Anthony Taylor4167% gamesnot enough data
Kyle Webb + Dylan Donaldson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Taylor
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Haack
126W–78L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Owen Massarelli
17W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Dylan Donaldson
26W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Edward McCall
37W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kyle Webb
174W–101L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Kevin Fraker
82W–82L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Eric Holterman
67W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.40
Jansen Meyers
138W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Bryan Ulery
23W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Kevin Weaver
32W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Beckdahl
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mason Pierri
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phillip Pierri
21W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.