Teams

EFSC - Taylor

2024 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-04vs Brevard/Luer/40&Over3.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Wilkes / Janis Mena vs Natalie Taylor / Katharyn Luer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTrisha Watson / Jennifer Roberts vs Daricca Facciobene / Erin Conway6-3, 6-0
2024-02-26vs EGYC - MackayLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanis Mena / Kate Kimball vs Natalie Oswell / Traci Radcliff2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTrisha Watson vs Jan MacKay4-6, 2-6
2024-02-05vs Suntree - HonakerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Wilkes / Trisha Watson vs Anastasia Mika / Elizabeth Pinchera2-6, 5-7
2024-02-01vs Brevard/Luer/40&Over3.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanis Mena / Susan Wilkes vs Katharyn Luer / Natalie Taylor4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLisa Shaffer / Trisha Watson vs Laura Rouveyrol / Jennifer Williams6-2, 6-1
2024-01-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTrisha Watson vs Leslie Pankey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-01-22vs Suntree - FordLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanis Mena / Alicia Hanrahan vs Cinda Felkner / Laura Breisch1-6, 2-6
2024-01-08vs EGYC - MackayWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanis Mena / Teresa Osborn vs Kalpana Gadodia / SARAH KILLION6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Janis Mena
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Trisha Watson
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Shelly Deater
published
2.81
Milena Alicea
published
2.73
Susan Wilkes
published
2.38
Lisa Shaffer
published
2.12
Alicia Hanrahan
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Janis Mena
73W–58L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Trisha Watson
130W–177L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Shelly Deater
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.84
Milena Alicea
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
Susan Wilkes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Lisa Shaffer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.38
2.5
Alicia Hanrahan
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.