Teams

GJTC McKENZIE

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - WS · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-05-12vs GJTC-JPAREGIENWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathy Den / Richard Plett vs Charles Barbieri / Heidi Scotting3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShane Chatfield / Hannah Bou-Matar vs Christopher Cutsforth / Jennifer Thompson7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesOmar Bou-Matar / Tina Hulihee vs Tracey Barbieri / Andy Ford6-1, 6-0
2021-05-05vs GJTC HPOUDRIERLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Kathy Den vs John Hanna / Carla Kohls6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Michelle Killian vs John Kohls / Andrea Bauer4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGary Reed / Nancy Paregien vs Dan Terrell / Susan Erb1-6, 5-7
2021-04-29vs GJTC CSMITHLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Kathy Den vs Mathew Dokoupil / Sharon Reiner6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShane Chatfield / Ramona McKenzie vs John Aggen / Holly Smith4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesOmar Bou-Matar / Tina Hulihee vs Jeff Thornton / Vicki Schoeber6-7, 3-6
2021-04-28vs GJTC CSMITHWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Kathy Den vs Craig Smith / Tinarivo Ranivomboahangy6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShane Chatfield / Hannah Bou-Matar vs Jeff Thornton / Vicki Schoeber6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesOmar Bou-Matar / Nancy Paregien vs Rodney Sharp / Amanda Grimsley4-6, 6-7
2021-04-21vs GJTC-JPAREGIENWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Kathy Den vs Curt Hansen / Miyuki Chovanetz6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShane Chatfield / Hannah Bou-Matar vs Jim Paregien / Jennifer Watson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesOmar Bou-Matar / Tina Hulihee vs Christopher Cutsforth / Tracey Barbieri6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-14vs GJTC HPOUDRIERWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Kathy Den vs Kriss Burwell / Susan Cassidy6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShane Chatfield / Ramona McKenzie vs John Hanna / Carla Kohls6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKeith Killian / Michelle Killian vs John Kohls / Andrea Bauer4-6, 4-6
2021-04-14vs GJTC HPOUDRIERLost 12
W#1 DoublesRamona McKenzie / Shane Chatfield vs Susan Erb / Kriss Burwell6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRichard Plett / Michelle Killian vs Carla Kohls / John Hanna3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Killian / Kimberly Jenkins vs John Kohls / Andrea Bauer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-07vs GJTC CSMITHLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Kathy Den vs Mathew Dokoupil / Sharon Reiner7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShane Chatfield / Ramona McKenzie vs Craig Smith / Tinarivo Ranivomboahangy4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGary Reed / Tina Hulihee vs Rodney Sharp / Amanda Grimsley3-6, 1-6
2021-03-31vs GJTC-JPAREGIENWon 20
W#1 DoublesRamona McKenzie / Richard Plett vs Jennifer Watson / Andy Ford6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Den / Keith Killian vs Heidi Scotting / Charles Barbieri6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Tina Hulihee
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.48
Richard Plett
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.47
Kathy Den
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.44
Hannah Bou-Matar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Nancy Paregien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Ramona McKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.79
Omar Bou-Matar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Keith Killian
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Michelle Killian
published
Shane Chatfield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Den + Richard Plett371161% games+8.1% vs expected
Shane Chatfield + Tina Hulihee9551% gamesnot enough data
Richard Plett + Tina Hulihee6162% gamesnot enough data
Ramona McKenzie + Richard Plett314 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Bou-Matar + Omar Bou-Matar314 matchesnot enough data
Omar Bou-Matar + Tina Hulihee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tina Hulihee
72W–92L career · 8 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Richard Plett
161W–68L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Kathy Den
173W–87L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Hannah Bou-Matar
150W–55L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
Nancy Paregien
85W–107L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Ramona McKenzie
57W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Omar Bou-Matar
61W–61L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Keith Killian
40W–109L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
2.78
Michelle Killian
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shane Chatfield
31W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.