Teams

LYNCHBURG - Thomas

2024 Lynchburg Tri-Level 18 & Over · Lynchburg Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-09vs OCC Bradley - Triple ThreatWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnmarie Hutchison / Mary Stuart Battle vs Eliana Marcilio / Lynn Will6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-08-27vs CAC Evans - Peace, Love & TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoy Rochow / Annmarie Hutchison vs Jennifer Smith Ramey / Janika Carey1-6, 1-6
2024-08-05vs OCC Bradley - Triple ThreatWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Stuart Battle / Annmarie Hutchison vs Kersten Morrison / Dawn Fraser7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Mary Stuart Battle
published
3.76
Cheryl Betz
published 4
3.69
Joy Rochow
published
3.61
Margaret Keller
published
3.60
Annmarie Hutchison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Rachele Novak
published
3.27
Jennipher Lucado
published
Adeline Clarke
published 3.5
3.07
Kerry Silva
published
2.91
Tracy Thomsic
published
2.79
Kelly Terrell
published
2.65
Maggie Cossman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Thomsic + Kerry Silva6451% games+2.7% vs expected
Mary Stuart Battle + Joy Rochow4257% games+0.7% vs expected
Jennipher Lucado + Margaret Keller314 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Thomsic + Kelly Terrell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Stuart Battle
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Cheryl Betz
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
Joy Rochow
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Margaret Keller
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Annmarie Hutchison
33W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Rachele Novak
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jennipher Lucado
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Adeline Clarke
7W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kerry Silva
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
Tracy Thomsic
37W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Kelly Terrell
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Maggie Cossman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.