Teams

Team 5 Westwood Team Fever Tree

2022 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-06vs Team 6 High VoltageLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Massey / Ryan Rohn vs Rajakumar Chithambaram / Manish Desai4-6, 0-6
2022-10-23vs Team 4 Swinging JohnsonsLost 01
L#2 DoublesRyan Rohn / Chris Harirchian vs Mark Matsko / Geoffrey Montgomery4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-29vs Team 10Won 10
W#2 DoublesOliver Lee / Richard Laukitis vs Daniel Hampton / Don Spies6-1, 6-0
2022-09-25vs Team 9 NoVa AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSuraj Goyle / Dan Winicour vs Manu Balasubramanian / Rory Smith3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesOliver Lee / Richard Laukitis vs Fa-Yueh Hung / Tieng Nguyen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-18vs Team 8Won 20
W#1 DoublesDan Winicour / David Turner vs Sami Habib / Gaiell-Mitchell Kercy6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesOliver Lee / Richard Laukitis vs Benjamin Butler / Jonathan Kim6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Oliver Lee
published
Brian Buyniski
published 4.5
4.22
Ivan Blas
published 4.5
4.20
Dan Winicour
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Richard Laukitis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Eric Joseph
published 4
Chris Harirchian
published 4
Craig Gavin
published 4
3.68
Ryan Rohn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Kevin Coyle
published
Jun Choi
published
Peter Klein
published
Ralph Nappi
published
Rick Frank
published
Suraj Goyle
published
Taylor McGowan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Laukitis + Dan Winicour2344% gamesnot enough data
Oliver Lee + Richard Laukitis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oliver Lee
31W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Brian Buyniski
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Ivan Blas
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Dan Winicour
106W–63L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Richard Laukitis
167W–99L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Eric Joseph
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Chris Harirchian
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Craig Gavin
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ryan Rohn
242W–218L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Kevin Coyle
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
Jun Choi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Klein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ralph Nappi
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rick Frank
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suraj Goyle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Taylor McGowan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.