Teams

SD 3.0WE Balboa Smashers/ Edwards

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesCandace Gyure vs MINGQING YANG6-3, 6-4
2022-05-31vs SD 3.0WE Coronado HS/ NelsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSonia Zepeda / Robin Kardon vs Jessica Cunningham / Elizabeth Dahlgren7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle VANN vs Amy Holzer6-1, 6-0
2022-05-29vs SD WE LLW 3.0 Peninsula TC/ GamaraSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLinda Kennedy / Candace Gyure vs Elayne Berman / Lydia Chou2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Kardon / Toosdhi McGowan vs Vivi Riding / Andrea Evans6-2, 7-5
2022-05-15vs SD 3.0WE SDTRC/ KleinerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCandace Gyure / Toosdhi McGowan vs Melinda Meader / Lisa Bolelli6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle VANN vs Sarah Schultzel6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-05-01vs SD 3.0WE-1PM RPTC/ SchroederWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle VANN / Irena Hukari vs Sabine Schroeder / Chau Hutcheson6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCandace Gyure vs Denise Wilson6-3, 6-1
2022-04-24vs SD 3.0WE Coronado HS/ NelsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle VANN / Toosdhi McGowan vs Joan Williams / Elizabeth Dahlgren6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesIrena Hukari vs Catherine Rodman6-1, 6-0
2022-04-17vs SD 3.0WE SDTRC/ KleinerWon 20
W#1 DoublesCathy Edwards / Candace Gyure vs Nancy Swirhun / Lisa Bolelli7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Kardon / Sonia Zepeda vs Stuti Jaiswal / Jennifer Hagstrom6-3, 6-1
2022-04-10vs SD WE LLW 3.0 Peninsula TC/ GamaraLost 01
L#1 SinglesIrena Hukari vs Valerie Puscasiu5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Michelle VANN
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Candace Gyure
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.88
Irena Hukari
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Cathy Edwards
published 3
2.64
Peggy Bentley
published
2.43
Sybilla Dorros
published
2.29
Robin Kardon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Kardon + Irena Hukari224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michelle VANN
67W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Candace Gyure
128W–86L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Irena Hukari
42W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Cathy Edwards
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Peggy Bentley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Sybilla Dorros
0W–9L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.43
3
Robin Kardon
22W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.