Teams

Not Our Fault

2024 Coed Spring · 4.0+

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-13vs 10SLost 02
L#1 Male DoublesJoseph Hout / Andrew Teasley vs Kawai Fregly / Todd Takeno2-6
L#1 Male SinglesAndrew Teasley vs John Carlson4-6
2024-04-12vs CathyLost 12
L#1 Female SinglesTriin Minton vs Linda Westwick4-6
W#1 Male DoublesAndrew Teasley / Joseph Hout vs Willy Stone / Derek Stone6-2
L#1 Male SinglesJoseph Hout vs Derek Stone3-6
2024-04-05vs 10SSplit 22
L#1 Female DoublesTriin Minton / Stacia Green vs Kima Kimura / Trena Rairdon4-6
W#1 Female SinglesTriin Minton vs Kima Kimura6-4
L#1 Male DoublesArne Krogh / Joseph Hout vs John Carlson / Kawai Fregly4-6
W#1 Male SinglesJoseph Hout vs Todd Takeno6-3
2024-03-30vs CathyLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesStacia Green / Elizabeth Drought vs Catherine Stone / Katrina Brown2-6
L#1 Male DoublesJames Robinson / Andrew Teasley vs Willy Stone / Derek Stone4-6
W#1 Male SinglesAndrew Teasley vs Derek Stone6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0+
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cathy04186685
2Not Our Fault0491515116
310S0491515117

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Joseph Hout
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Teasley
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
James Robinson
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Triin Minton
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Stacia Green
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Arne Krogh
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Elizabeth Drought
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Triin Minton + Joseph Hout3258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Hout
24W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Andrew Teasley
59W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
James Robinson
42W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Triin Minton
123W–112L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Stacia Green
93W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Arne Krogh
30W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Elizabeth Drought
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.