Teams

Carpenter/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-09-01vs Price/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Irvine / JoAnn Cooper vs Allison Ewing / Michele Thomas6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVirginia Wynn / Melony Bratton vs Xiaoqun Akers / Tanya Myers6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDorothy Work / Brooke Smith vs Stacy Oswalt / Charissa Derieg6-2, 6-3
2026-08-04vs Beanblossom/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Irvine / SHELLEY O'CONNOR vs Elizabeth Warren / Diana Phillips7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoAnn Cooper / Brooke Smith vs Eleanore Maynard / Alison Elkington6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Carpenter / Virginia Wynn vs Alexandra Morin / Susannah Mays6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Carly McWatters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Lacey Moody
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
JoAnn Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.28
Melony Bratton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
SHELLEY O'CONNOR
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Julie Little
published
2.87
Jacqueline Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Dorothy Work
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Virginia Wynn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Angela Brackett
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Moody + Virginia Wynn4548% games+5.1% vs expected
SHELLEY O'CONNOR + JoAnn Cooper332156% games+3.5% vs expected
Jacqueline Carpenter + Carly McWatters5156% gamesnot enough data
JoAnn Cooper + Carly McWatters2354% gamesnot enough data
Carly McWatters + Lacey Moody314 matchesnot enough data
SHELLEY O'CONNOR + Angela Brackett213 matchesnot enough data
JoAnn Cooper + Melony Bratton213 matchesnot enough data
JoAnn Cooper + Jacqueline Carpenter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carly McWatters
51W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Lacey Moody
38W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
JoAnn Cooper
64W–38L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
Melony Bratton
91W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
SHELLEY O'CONNOR
52W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Julie Little
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.00
3
Jacqueline Carpenter
42W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Dorothy Work
32W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Virginia Wynn
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Angela Brackett
23W–19L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.