Teams

Hanley 55+ 9.0

2023 55&Over Men · 9.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-26vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 Mens 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Hanley / James Motta vs David Brown / William DeSantis3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Enzien / John Evans vs Patrick Bologna / Dave Picchi3-6, 5-7
2023-08-21vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 Mens 55Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Dorsey / Matt Picardi vs Thomas Schmitz / James Axford3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Enzien / Robert Farley vs Dylan Davis / Jeff Strong4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChris Hanley / Joseph DeSantis vs Patrick Bologna / Eric Ohern6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-17vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 Mens 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAlan Oppenheim / Matt Picardi vs Patrick Bologna / Eric Ohern1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Enzien / James Motta vs David Brown / Dave Picchi3-6, 0-6
2023-08-14vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 Mens 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMatt Picardi / Scott Bellcourt vs Dave Picchi / Jeff Strong4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJohn Enzien / Robert Farley vs William DeSantis / Eric Ohern4-6, 2-6
2023-08-10vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 Mens 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Hanley / John Evans vs David Brown / Thomas Schmitz0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Farley / Matt Picardi vs James Axford / Eric Ohern1-6, 3-6
2023-07-20vs Northern: Bologna 9.0 Mens 55Split 11
L#1 DoublesChris Hanley / John Evans vs Dylan Davis / James Axford2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlan Oppenheim / Robert Farley vs Patrick Bologna / David Brown7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: Bologna 9.0 Mens 5560162589
2Hanley 55+ 9.00621632199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Robert Farley
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.66
Chris Hanley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.63
Matt Picardi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Alan Oppenheim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John Enzien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Dorsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Bellcourt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Hanley + Matt Picardi134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Farley
28W–42L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Chris Hanley
50W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Matt Picardi
4W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Alan Oppenheim
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Enzien
2W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Dorsey
25W–35L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Scott Bellcourt
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.