Teams

1-HRemley - Eno 9.5

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Women Evening

12 players · average NTRP 4.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-28vs 2-RDavis-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Tanita Tedamrongwanish vs Allison Ostrander / Elizabeth Speicher4-6, 6-7
2022-09-21vs 2-RDavis-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesKate Medynskaya / Lisa Spees vs Rachel Davis / Allison Ostrander6-4, 6-3
2022-09-14vs 2-RDavis-EnoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Ivette Duran vs Betsy Shoffner / Jennifer Moore6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Spees / Karen Griffin vs Heidi Steiber / Lorraine Bowen1-6, 4-6
2022-08-31vs 2-RDavis-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Jennifer McEntee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMaryBeth Jackson / Ivette Duran vs Betsy Shoffner / Donna Stieber1-6, 6-7
2022-08-29vs 2-RDavis-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMacY Fisher / MaryBeth Jackson vs Anne Frautschi / Elizabeth Speicher5-7, 4-6
2022-08-24vs 2-RDavis-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer McEntee / Heather Remley vs Jode Ritsema / Betsy Shoffner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesIvette Duran / Tanita Tedamrongwanish vs Rachel Davis / Donna Stieber5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-10vs 2-RDavis-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesIvette Duran / Leslie Boesch vs Emily Tinervin / Heidi Steiber1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Griffin / Lisa Spees vs Elizabeth Speicher / Michelle Ahlquist6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Jennifer Hiller
published
4.85
Elizabeth Hodges
published 5
4.70
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.54
Ivette Duran
published 5
4.47
4.46
MaryBeth Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.43
Leslie Boesch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.35
MacY Fisher
published
4.34
Lisa Spees
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.33
Jessica Mauney
published
Logan Shapiro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MaryBeth Jackson + Tanita Tedamrongwanish4257% games+10.2% vs expected
Leslie Boesch + Heather Remley3455% games+7.6% vs expected
Heather Remley + Tanita Tedamrongwanish10653% gamesnot enough data
Tanita Tedamrongwanish + Lisa Spees3351% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Boesch + MaryBeth Jackson3256% gamesnot enough data
MaryBeth Jackson + Elizabeth Hodges3261% gamesnot enough data
Heather Remley + Jennifer Hiller123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hiller + Elizabeth Hodges213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hiller
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
4.93
5
Elizabeth Hodges
19W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
4.85
5
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
179W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.70
5
Ivette Duran
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
4.54
Mary-Katherine Martin
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
4.47
4.5
MaryBeth Jackson
108W–57L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Leslie Boesch
245W–102L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
5
Heather Remley
298W–155L career · 8 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
4.42
MacY Fisher
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
4.35
4.5
Lisa Spees
97W–62L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
Jessica Mauney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
4.33
Logan Shapiro
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.