Teams

DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)

2022 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over 7.5 Women - Fri AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-09-23vs MFigard (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Bost / Patty Kahle vs Debbie Carmazzi / Irene Kossack1-6, 3-6
2022-09-16vs MFigard (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDenise Bost / Janice Daniel vs Dorothy Gandar / Suzanne Pignetti6-1, 6-3
2022-09-02vs MFigard (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDonna Buchman / Denise Bost vs Marsha McCrory / Patti Ratcliffe4-6, 6-7
2022-08-19vs MFigard (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDenise Bost / Donna Buchman vs Patti Ratcliffe / Marsha McCrory2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over 7.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Denise Bost
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Janice Daniel
published
3.28
Joy Landesman
published
3.27
Julie Benton
published
3.27
Sally Lowrance
published
3.20
Mildred Deely
published 3.5
3.20
Lina Mazigi
published
3.11
Donna Buchman
published 3.5
3.11
Teresa Brown
published
2.97
Patty Kahle
published
2.96
Katherine Hargett
published
Meridy Kennington
published
Sandra Stowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Daniel + Denise Bost5255% games−2.7% vs expected
Katherine Hargett + Julie Benton1648% gamesnot enough data
Lina Mazigi + Mildred Deely2443% gamesnot enough data
Joy Landesman + Lina Mazigi224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Bost
206W–139L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Janice Daniel
41W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Joy Landesman
20W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Julie Benton
47W–40L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Sally Lowrance
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Mildred Deely
79W–102L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Lina Mazigi
13W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Donna Buchman
7W–25L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Teresa Brown
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Patty Kahle
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
Katherine Hargett
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
Meridy Kennington
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Stowe
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.