← Teams

VTC-Gaylor/Wilcox

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.59 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Dean Gaylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
JT Smith
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.43
Alan Jones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Andy LaFrazia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
John Hapke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Jim Hamlik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Kim Hamlik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Queenie Hapke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Tammy LaFrazia
published 3.5
3.18
Kelley Gaylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-08-10Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesAlan Jones / Heidi Kjos vs Naun Yvonne Kim / Xiaolin Nan6-2, 6-4
2025-08-02Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesJim Hamlik / Kim Hamlik vs Nozomi Bray / Omar Martinez6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJT Smith / Stephanie Smith vs Aluko Hope / Brooke Kuerbis6-1, 6-1
2025-07-27Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesAndy LaFrazia / Heidi Kjos vs Jihoon Bang / Kim Tellin7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJT Smith / Stephanie Smith vs Jill Boyce / Rajan Madhusudan6-3, 6-3
2025-07-20Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJT Smith / Stephanie Smith vs Tony Humpage / Emily Qi5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlan Jones / Trylla Lembke vs Matt Bolte / Gail Bolte6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor vs Simon Lofts / Catherine Lofts6-1, 6-3
2025-07-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor vs Nancy Korenek-Leveque / Scott Mayer6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlan Jones / Trylla Lembke vs Paula Watt / Greg Arendt5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Andy LaFrazia vs Julie Trujillo / Mark Beilstein6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-12Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJT Smith / Stephanie Smith vs Sac Roth / Jing Feng6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Hapke / Queenie Hapke vs Rajeev Chitram / Rie Sasakawa6-4, 6-1
2025-07-05Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJohn Hapke / Queenie Hapke vs Greg Vitunic / Callen Sterling6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJim Hamlik / Kim Hamlik vs Robert Glenn / Crystal Ounaphom2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesQueenie Hapke / John Hapke vs Lauren Smith / NANDA SIDDAIAH7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik vs Tonya Halog / James Lawrence6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor vs Cara Williams / Hien Lu6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Dean Gaylor
88W–63L career
12%88%1%
3.66
4
JT Smith
83W–90L career
20%80%0%
3.56
3.5
Alan Jones
96W–69L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Andy LaFrazia
65W–34L career
4%86%10%
3.33
3.5
John Hapke
81W–77L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
Jim Hamlik
33W–46L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kim Hamlik
24W–44L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Queenie Hapke
26W–31L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tammy LaFrazia
44W–25L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kelley Gaylor
68W–64L career
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.