Teams

Island Country Club - Mattke

2021 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesDana Bursch / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Jennifer Amaya / Christine Kriss5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-18vs Quail West - HeerwagenWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Bursch / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Jordan Jaffe / Roxana Scott6-1, 6-3
2021-05-12vs Isles of Collier - OddyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDana Bursch / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Barbara Slifkin / Kathleen Barger5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesDana Bursch / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Donna McGraw / Janet Olliges6-1, 6-4
2021-05-04vs Pelican Bay South - J. HowardWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Kastholm / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Lisa Arnold / Judi Howard6-4, 6-3
2021-04-27vs COLLIER - Marco YMCA - K. LewisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Kastholm / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Debra Caudill / Jan Jackman5-7, 4-6
2021-04-20vs Hammock Bay - P. CraneWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Kastholm / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Lauren Hattenbach / Laura Hansmann6-2, 6-1
2021-04-13vs World Tennis Center - L. ChappellWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Kastholm / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Lisa Chappell / Michelle Minor6-3, 7-5
2021-04-06vs Village Walk Bonita - A. KremerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Kastholm / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Ann Kremer / Mary McIntire6-1, 6-2
2021-03-23vs Pelican Marsh - BishopLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Kastholm / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Elizabeth Giannetti / Rosita Gilsenan4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Julie Kastholm
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.28
Dana Bursch
published 3.5
3.27
Jennifer Stonebreaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Laura Parkey
published
3.11
Sally Mattke
published
3.07
Cecilia Murphy
published 3.5
3.00
Joyce Hail
published
2.94
Michele Pallone
published
Kimberly Maly
published
Michele Maly Dykema
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Stonebreaker + Julie Kastholm4552% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Murphy + Michele Pallone314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julie Kastholm
125W–82L career · 12 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Dana Bursch
46W–45L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Jennifer Stonebreaker
42W–25L career · 10 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Laura Parkey
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.16
Sally Mattke
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Cecilia Murphy
15W–32L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
Joyce Hail
4W–14L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.00
Michele Pallone
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
2.94
Kimberly Maly
8W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele Maly Dykema
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.