Teams

UPTA54FF/Michalovsky/Reserve

2025 Fun Fall 54 & Over - GTL · 3.0 Women FF

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-03vs UPTA54FF/Kimbell/ThornbladeLost 02
L#1 DoublesKay King / Michele Evanski vs Erin Byxbee / Debbie Kiriakides2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Michalovsky / Candice Limousin vs Carrie Dickert / Kelli Reinstein2-6, 3-6
2025-11-26vs UPTA54FF/Brooks/Keowee KeyLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichele Evanski / Mary McCarthy vs Joyce Brooks / Laurie Sinkele6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCandice Limousin / Kathy Mendel vs Eileen Simollardes / Lisa Weinstein2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Stetson / Debra Michalovsky vs Vicki Tougaw / Susan Kaurloto2-6, 4-6
2025-11-19vs UPTA55FF/Tassin/Keowee KeyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary McCarthy / Michele Evanski vs Kirsten Zinkann / Susan Dougherty5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCandice Limousin / Kathy Mendel vs Muriel Rankin / Debbie Maupin6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDebra Michalovsky / Kathleen Stetson vs Lisa Murphy / Sherry Blaha2-6, 0-6
2025-11-13vs UPTA54FF/Madden/GCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary McCarthy / Stephanie Mitchell vs Jennifer Infinger / Stacy Alexandrou3-6, 3-6
2025-10-22vs UPTA54FF/Lawson/Holly TreeWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Michele Evanski vs Tarah M Smith / Gretchen Lawson6-4, 6-0
2025-10-08vs UPTA54FF/Wilson/BrookstoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Michele Evanski vs Cathy Feinstein / Lisa Troup6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Bobbi Nailor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Lisa Apsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Beverly Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Kim Smentek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Stephanie Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Michele Evanski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Kay King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Candice Limousin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Kathy Mendel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Kathleen Stetson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Debra Michalovsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Sandra Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Smentek + Bobbi Nailor6260% games+5.3% vs expected
Kay King + Candice Limousin2348% games−10.0% vs expected
Kathy Mendel + Candice Limousin2443% games−10.0% vs expected
Debra Michalovsky + Kathleen Stetson0523% gamesnot enough data
Kim Smentek + Michele Evanski123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Mendel + Michele Evanski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bobbi Nailor
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Lisa Apsey
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Beverly Gibbs
74W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kim Smentek
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Stephanie Mitchell
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Michele Evanski
11W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Kay King
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Candice Limousin
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kathy Mendel
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Kathleen Stetson
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.19
2.5
Debra Michalovsky
1W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Sandra Lewis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.