Teams

Ti.Santospago40C

2023 Cap Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-29vs Kr.Koren40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Bell / Kellie Chesson vs Rachael Yelverton / Jeanie White0-6, 4-6
2023-09-15vs Ki.Patrey40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesTara LeFevre / Jacqueline Wolborsky vs Laura McNiven / Wendy Lindberg2-6, 1-6
2023-09-14vs Su.Knowles40CLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennie Williams / Tara LeFevre vs Lynn Trefzger / Leigh Magee4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTina Santospago / Jacqueline Wolborsky vs Maggie Patterson / Suzanne Wagner6-7, 3-6
2023-09-08vs Re.Sears40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesKellie Chesson / Sarah Bell vs Lisa Talton / Danielle Stringer1-6, 2-6
2023-08-25vs Kr.Koren40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesTina Santospago / Jacqueline Wolborsky vs Sharon Baggett / LeAnne Bloedon4-6, 2-6
2023-08-11vs Ki.Patrey40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Bell / Kellie Chesson vs Leah Weinberger / Angela Baxley6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Bennett / Tina Santospago vs Kimberly Patrey / Traci Brooks2-6, 4-6
2023-08-04vs Re.Sears40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesTina Santospago / Megan Bennett vs Rebecca Sears / Jennifer McCown6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Jacqueline Wolborsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Tara LeFevre
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.08
Kellie Chesson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Karen Wakeford
published
2.74
Tina Santospago
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Wolborsky + Tina Santospago6450% gamesnot enough data
Tina Santospago + Kellie Chesson0536% gamesnot enough data
Tara LeFevre + Jacqueline Wolborsky224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacqueline Wolborsky
66W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Tara LeFevre
199W–175L career · 8 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Kellie Chesson
107W–119L career · 5 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Karen Wakeford
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Tina Santospago
51W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.