Teams

Hunters Green - E. Vickers

2026 Hillsborough Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesTheresa Mays / Karen Cleland vs Karen Montembeault / Donna Whiting1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPat Morris / Carmen Heggen vs Cissy Barr / Ginger Marchiniak4-6, 5-7
2026-03-06vs Plant City 65+ - P. SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Ellen Ghelardi vs Leisa Jordan / Kandy Wood6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheresa Mays / Pat Morris vs Karen Bateman / Sheila Brown4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Arment / Carmen Heggen vs Susan Rind / Jo Morton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesTheresa Mays / Peggy Pusateri vs Debra Lowe / Kathleen Norton6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEllen Ghelardi / Amy Rairigh vs Sharon Lucas / Karen Johnson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren Cleland / Cindy Arment vs Margaret McGillivray / Kathleen Gafarian2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesPamela Woodham / Amy Rairigh vs Karen Montembeault / Donna Whiting2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPeggy Pusateri / Ellen Ghelardi vs Jane Feeney / Amalia Alaniz6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Mays / Karen Cleland vs Ginger Marchiniak / Cissy Barr3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-13vs Plant City 65+ - P. SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Woodham / Theresa Mays vs Catherine Mueller / Kandy Wood4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeggy Pusateri / Ellen Ghelardi vs Karen Bateman / Leisa Jordan6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Hannah Gabora vs Dorothy Flair / Jo Morton6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesCarmen Heggen / Karen Cachion vs Debra Lowe / Kathleen Norton1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Cleland / Amy Rairigh vs Margaret McGillivray / Kathleen Gafarian4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPat Morris / Ellen Ghelardi vs Karen Johnson / Christine Nethers6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesKaren Cachion / Pat Morris vs Barbara Dolan / Donna Whiting6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Cleland / Theresa Mays vs Karen Montembeault / Mary Raymond6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeggy Pusateri / Amy Rairigh vs Amalia Alaniz / Ginger Marchiniak6-2, 6-4
2026-01-23vs Plant City 65+ - P. SmithWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Cleland / Ellen Ghelardi vs Karen Bateman / Kandy Wood4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Arment / Carmen Heggen vs Patricia Smith / Margaret Huggins6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Mays / Pamela Woodham vs Susan Rind / Julianna Holbrook6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesPeggy Pusateri / Karen Cachion vs Kathleen Gafarian / Margaret McGillivray6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Cleland / Theresa Mays vs Kathleen Norton / Kelsey B Nix4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarmen Heggen / Amy Rairigh vs Sharon Woodruff / Nancy Matuszak6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Erin Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Ellen Ghelardi
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.85
Peggy Pusateri
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Karen Cachion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Cindy Arment
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Amy Rairigh
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.67
Theresa Mays
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.63
Hannah Gabora
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Pamela Woodham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Carmen Heggen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.51
Karen Cleland
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.29
Pat Morris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Cleland + Theresa Mays1638% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Arment + Carmen Heggen213 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Gabora + Karen Cleland123 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Mays + Karen Cachion213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Ellen Ghelardi
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Peggy Pusateri
44W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Karen Cachion
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Cindy Arment
50W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Amy Rairigh
33W–44L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Theresa Mays
6W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Hannah Gabora
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Pamela Woodham
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Carmen Heggen
5W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Karen Cleland
3W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Pat Morris
31W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.