Teams

Burns 55s 8.5M Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 8.5 Men 55+ Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 8.5 Men 55+ Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Burns 55s 8.5M Mon PM000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Scott Dean
published
4.26
Chuck Burns
published 4.5
4.20
David Leatherwood
published 4.5
4.16
Eric Anthony
published
3.98
Charley Eberhard
published 4
3.93
Peter Novosad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Glenn Mosseller
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Dean
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.80
4.5
Chuck Burns
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
David Leatherwood
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.20
Eric Anthony
18W–11L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.16
4
Charley Eberhard
11W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
Peter Novosad
39W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Glenn Mosseller
5W–11L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.