Teams

GSTL55/Waybright/Wachesaw

2025 Adult 55 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-05vs GSTL55/Paudel/DunesWon 21
W#1 DoublesGenie Matthews / Whitney Hewitt vs Katie Sandoz / Elisabeth Woodard6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGwen Murray / Suzanne Baxter vs Reaves Langdale / Myla Butler6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMegan Mcdonald / Samantha Saber vs Deborah Conner / Mary Gene Singleton0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-01vs GSTL55/Paudel/DunesWon 30
W#1 DoublesWhitney Hewitt / Genie Matthews vs Shai Kahn / Dipti Paudel6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Singleton / Gwen Murray vs Mary Stokes / Mary Singleton7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Marcia Nichols vs Linda Smith / Deborah Conner6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Whitney Hewitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Michele Singleton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Deanna Waybright
published 3.5
2.97
Gwen Murray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Genie Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Jeanne Mize
published
2.71
Sloan Derrick
published
Marcia Nichols
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Saber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Genie Matthews + Whitney Hewitt5258% games+15.6% vs expected
Michele Singleton + Gwen Murray6453% games+6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Hewitt
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Michele Singleton
37W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
3.5
Deanna Waybright
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Gwen Murray
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Genie Matthews
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Jeanne Mize
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
Sloan Derrick
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Marcia Nichols
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Saber
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.