Teams

Cramer - 40 Love

2025 Fredericksburg Adult 40 & Over · Fredericksburg Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-22vs Isham - Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Huntington / Megan Roberge vs Amara Halt / Lillian Bullock6-1, 6-1
2025-07-19vs Isham - Slice GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Roberge / Sue Nilsson vs Amara Halt / Lillian Bullock6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmanda Jamero / Jill Huntington vs Synda Mark / Bianca Cummings Reynard6-2, 6-0
2025-07-15vs Isham - Slice GirlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Huntington / Beth Sanford vs Jennifer Isham / Lisa Bartley7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSue Nilsson / Mary Blake vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-08vs Isham - Slice GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Huntington / Beth Sanford vs Synda Mark / Rachel Burner6-1, 6-3
2025-07-01vs Isham - Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Huntington / Sabra Szczyglowski vs Lisa Bartley / Lillian Bullock6-0, 6-1
2025-06-28vs Isham - Slice GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Jamero / Teresa Stone vs Amara Halt / Lisa Bartley6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMegan Roberge / Tara Ford vs Lillian Bullock / Jennifer Isham6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMary Blake / Beth Sanford vs Linda Catullo / Rachel Burner6-7, 3-6
2025-06-21vs Isham - Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Huntington / Kathryn Menchion vs Lillian Bullock / Amara Halt6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Leslie Caliri
published 3.5
3.21
Amanda Jamero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.15
Jill Huntington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Megan Roberge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Hannah Cramer
published
2.93
Sabra Szczyglowski
published
2.93
Katie DeWald
published
2.81
Tara Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Sue Nilsson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Beth Sanford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mary Blake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Leslie Caliri
50W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3
Amanda Jamero
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
3
Jill Huntington
206W–137L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Megan Roberge
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Hannah Cramer
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Sabra Szczyglowski
32W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Katie DeWald
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Sue Nilsson
85W–147L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Beth Sanford
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Mary Blake
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Stone
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.