Teams

Arbor Green BourbonBoys/ P. Williams

2026 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.94 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-13vs HILLS/OrsiniSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPaul Williams / Sundar Ekambaram vs Abhik Roy / Andrew Sheets7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNADESH RAMROOP vs Michael Rossi6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEugen Schwarz / Jay Kandell vs Ernie Pabon / Hiren Bhatt4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Zack / Felipe Martinez vs James McAuley / Jaime Villegas4-3
2026-06-06vs WestMeadows Phoenix/SambaathWon 31
W#1 DoublesSylvain Gauthier / Sundar Ekambaram vs Jaianand Jayaraman / Karthik Thilakarajan7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJose Alomar / William Arfsten vs Ranga Kandadai / Sriharinath Tractor6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFelipe Martinez / James Smiechewicz vs PHIMAGHAM PREMKANTH / Ajay Venugopalan6-4, 6-2
L#4 DoublesBrian Deters / Tom Layton vs PRAFUL NAIR / Hari Nair3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-30vs ChevalKnights/Cheval/ M. HayesWon 32
L#1 DoublesEugene Martineau / Jay Kandell vs Charles Constantine / Matthew Hayes3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEugen Schwarz vs Dennis Wright2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Williams / Sylvain Gauthier vs Jason Lichtman / Kenneth Sallings6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJose Alomar / William Arfsten vs Gregory Perpetua / Andrew Busby6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesFelipe Martinez / Paul Zack vs Todd Abrams / Peter Marsocci6-2, 6-3
2026-05-16vs Buckhorn/JustBuckIt/SeitzingerWon 41
W#1 DoublesPaul Williams / Eugene Martineau vs Sebastian Graba / Ben DeBrocke5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEugen Schwarz vs David Bounds6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSylvain Gauthier / Jay Kandell vs David Voelker / Mohamed Khader6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul Zack / Konstantinos Vasilopoulos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#4 DoublesJames Smiechewicz / NADESH RAMROOP vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-09vs West Meadows/ C. KarkourWon 41
W#1 DoublesSylvain Gauthier / Jose Alomar vs Neil Scott / Charbel Karkour6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEugen Schwarz vs Damien Munnings4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDarin Garner / Jay Kandell vs Mithra Pamaraju / Victor Diaz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Arfsten / James Smiechewicz vs Randall Becerra del Gallego / Rogerio Buchner de Freitas6-0, 6-3
W#4 DoublesPaul Zack / Konstantinos Vasilopoulos vs Walter Carpenter / Anthony Olvey6-1, 6-2
2026-05-02vs Mouratoglou Academy/ LynhamSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPaul Zack / Felipe Martinez vs Chad Paluzzi / Shashikiran Suresh7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Deters / Eugene Martineau vs Joey Campbell / Siwei Jin3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJames Smiechewicz / William Arfsten vs Eddie Collins / Erik Hajek4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#4 DoublesSylvain Gauthier / Jay Kandell vs Todd Vandeberg / Gregory Morrissey6-2, 6-2
2026-04-29vs Tampa Yacht/ G. ColdrionLost 14
W#1 DoublesPaul Williams / Jakob Andersen vs Chase Pattillo / Ken Jackson6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNADESH RAMROOP vs Robert Graham4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Bell / Eugene Martineau vs Gregg Coldiron / Taylor Garland4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPaul Zack / Felipe Martinez vs Chuck Davis / RICHARD CASEY3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesSylvain Gauthier / Darin Garner vs Bennett Barrow / Daniel Perez6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-04-11vs HCC /MadDucks/ MurdockWon 32
L#1 DoublesPaul Williams / Jakob Andersen vs Erik Breitenbach / Ray Eckstein6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNADESH RAMROOP vs Thach Dinh3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Zack / Sylvain Gauthier vs Naveen Kumria / Christopher Hollingsworth6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWilliam Arfsten / Jose Alomar vs Michael Laccabue / Daren McGovern6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#4 DoublesEugene Martineau / Jay Kandell vs Doug Clery / Kevin Brick3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
NADESH RAMROOP
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.91
Eugen Schwarz
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
Felipe Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Paul Zack
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published
3.84
Jakob Andersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
James Smiechewicz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Jose Alomar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.78
Adam Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
William Arfsten
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.76
Eugene Martineau
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.76
Paul Williams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.69
Sylvain Gauthier
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published
3.63
Sundar Ekambaram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Jay Kandell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Darin Garner
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Brian Deters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Konstantinos Vasilopoulos
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Layton
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvain Gauthier + Jose Alomar5256% games+5.3% vs expected
Paul Williams + Jakob Andersen6257% games+3.8% vs expected
Paul Zack + Felipe Martinez10259% games+2.0% vs expected
Jose Alomar + William Arfsten7158% games+1.3% vs expected
Sylvain Gauthier + Jay Kandell4157% games+0.1% vs expected
Eugene Martineau + Paul Williams7555% gamesnot enough data
Darin Garner + Paul Williams4262% gamesnot enough data
Tom Layton + Paul Williams4261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

NADESH RAMROOP
22W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Eugen Schwarz
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Felipe Martinez
23W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.87
Paul Zack
31W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Jakob Andersen
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
James Smiechewicz
15W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
Jose Alomar
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Adam Bell
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
William Arfsten
11W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Eugene Martineau
57W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Paul Williams
136W–82L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Sylvain Gauthier
23W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Sundar Ekambaram
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jay Kandell
7W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Darin Garner
104W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Brian Deters
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Konstantinos Vasilopoulos
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tom Layton
40W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.