← Teams

IRV-Zawadzki(s)

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Willis Boyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Amir Tadjedin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Michelle Zawadzki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Kristen LaBarca
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
John LaBarca
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Rob Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Keith Zawadzki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Scott Naugler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Kelly Norling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Michelle Boucher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2018-11-11Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesDenise Townsend / Willis Boyer vs John McCarthy / Andrea Kropp6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Tadjedin / Amir Tadjedin vs Annie Tran / Mike Olson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2018-11-04Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLaurel Hallock Koppelman / Scott Naugler vs Damir Lemes / Lynne Nieda7-6, 6-2
2018-11-03Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLeslie Cole / Scott Naugler vs Rebecca Griffith / Humberto Gomez6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichelle Zawadzki / Brad Mathewson vs Angela Diaz de Leon / Miguel Diaz de Leon6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKeith Zawadzki / Michelle Boucher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2018-10-28Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKristen LaBarca / John LaBarca vs Karl Kropp / Christina Parks6-1, 6-0
2018-10-06Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKelly Norling / Willis Boyer vs Yogesh Patel / Patty Chen6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKeith Zawadzki / Michelle Zawadzki vs Timothea Barnatan / Peter Brandenburger2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRob Chandler / Sarie Crothers vs Rajan Madhusudan / Natalia Joelson6-3, 6-3
2018-09-29Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesBrad Mathewson / Michelle Boucher vs Lisa Fogg / Scott Mayer7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaurel Hallock Koppelman / Scott Naugler vs Pamela Michie / William Place7-6, 6-3
2018-09-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDenise Townsend / Rob Chandler vs Kayla Casebeer / Jesse Inkpen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith Zawadzki / Michelle Zawadzki vs Sarah Robertson / Richard Anderson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn LaBarca / Kristen LaBarca vs Jim Lekas / Holly Lekas2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2018-09-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKelly Norling / Brent Grubb vs Kimberly Parks / ANTHONY PEPE6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesWillis Boyer / Leslie Cole vs Alyssa Wong / William Allers6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmir Tadjedin / Jennifer Tadjedin vs Lauren Larsen / Lee Ritter6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Willis Boyer
75W–32L career
7%93%0%
3.64
4
Amir Tadjedin
24W–19L career
33%67%0%
3.53
3.5
Michelle Zawadzki
74W–33L career
0%81%19%
3.48
3.5
Kristen LaBarca
65W–38L career
0%90%10%
3.44
3.5
John LaBarca
46W–27L career
0%87%13%
3.42
3.5
Rob Chandler
29W–34L career
0%97%3%
3.34
3.5
Keith Zawadzki
24W–15L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Scott Naugler
106W–59L career
1%99%0%
3.21
3.5
Kelly Norling
68W–45L career
3%97%0%
3.21
3
Laurel Hallock Koppelman
74W–75L career
0%97%3%
2.87
3
Michelle Boucher
45W–40L career
1%93%6%
2.85

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.