Teams

BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 40AW3.5A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Ginni Dhindsa
published
3.40
Karen Rogge
published
3.39
Pooja Tendulkar
published
3.33
Elaine Roe
published
3.33
Gail Fong
published
3.32
Katherine Sandell
published
3.25
Susan Fontaine
published
3.25
Cathleen Ligman
published 3.5
3.21
3.13
Patrizia Fazeli
published
3.13
Nelly Eunhee Park
published
3.11
Inna Cantor
published
2.98
Vera Parengkuan
published
2.95
Hoai Cao
published
2.93
Elizabeth Hitchcock
published
2.90
Catherine Nadeau
published 3.5
2.88
Rae Chiang
published
2.81
Leticia Lafosse
published
2.81
Nancy Pizzo
published
2.80
2.75
Cindy Motamedi
published 3
2.68
Noriko Sekikawa
published
Erinn O'Reilly
published
Katrina Heiles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Dao-Makiyama + Vera Parengkuan4148% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Pizzo + Noriko Sekikawa033 matchesnot enough data
Leticia Lafosse + Cindy Motamedi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginni Dhindsa
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Karen Rogge
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Pooja Tendulkar
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Elaine Roe
22W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Gail Fong
100W–56L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Katherine Sandell
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Susan Fontaine
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Cathleen Ligman
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Theresa Dao-Makiyama
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Patrizia Fazeli
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Nelly Eunhee Park
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
Inna Cantor
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Vera Parengkuan
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
Hoai Cao
1W–12L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
Elizabeth Hitchcock
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3.5
Catherine Nadeau
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.90
Rae Chiang
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Leticia Lafosse
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Nancy Pizzo
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.81
Sangeetha Narasimhan
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Cindy Motamedi
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Noriko Sekikawa
5W–22L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Erinn O'Reilly
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katrina Heiles
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.