Teams

SDNC 4.5 Surf and Turf (2:2)/ Doyle

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WD · SDNC - Women - 4.5 WD

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-06vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC (2:2)/ MayLost 01
L#2 DoublesKellie Doyle / Jil Frederick vs Megan Steadman / Carol Donahue5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJenny Sharratt / Lori Davis vs Annemarie Brigandi / Lisa Crisafulli2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKellie Doyle / Kami Guerrier vs Cynthia Delgado / Prentiss van Den Berg1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKellie Doyle / Christina Bernstein vs Lisa Barthelemy / Sarah Becker6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesJil Frederick / Kellie Doyle vs Shari Hume / Kelly Villasenor6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJil Frederick / Kellie Doyle vs Anna Palmer / Adele Psyllos6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJenny Sharratt vs Sheila Paguyo6-4, 6-2
2023-01-11vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC (2:2)/ MayLost 01
L#1 DoublesKellie Doyle / Jil Frederick vs Carol Donahue / Michelle May2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Beth Sharratt
published 4.5
4.32
Catharine Conover
published 4.5
4.30
Jenny Sharratt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Erin Wall
published 4.5
4.13
Kami Guerrier
published
4.09
Christina Bernstein
published 4.5
4.08
Kellie Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.72
Jane Khouw
published
Tracy Muesing
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Sharratt + Beth Sharratt5164% games+3.4% vs expected
Erin Wall + Christina Bernstein2347% games−11.3% vs expected
Kami Guerrier + Kellie Doyle134 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Sharratt + Kellie Doyle303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Beth Sharratt
21W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.51
4.5
Catharine Conover
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Jenny Sharratt
93W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Erin Wall
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
Kami Guerrier
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Christina Bernstein
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Kellie Doyle
129W–116L career · 6 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
Jane Khouw
16W–18L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Tracy Muesing
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.