Teams

Smith/Nashville

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Nashville · 4.0 Men - Sunday Daytime

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-28vs Blankenship/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSteven Anderson / Kerry Smyth vs Michael Mihalik / Gary Thompson0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Correll / Roger Fuhrman vs Mike Bolds / Don Caffery6-0, 7-6
2026-06-21vs Blankenship/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Dahlstein / Steven Anderson vs John Rowenczak / Ray Brown5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJack Vandercook / Daniel Hayes vs Jay Olson / Michael Mihalik7-6, 6-1
2026-06-14vs Blankenship/NashvilleLost 02
L#2 DoublesSteven Anderson / Kerry Smyth vs Steve Gaines / Gary Witzgall2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Hayes / Jack Vandercook vs Tony Lance / Dan Ostrander3-6, 2-6
2026-06-07vs Blankenship/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Dahlstein / Steven Anderson vs J Dennis Covington / Tony Lance4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Correll / Steve Smith vs Steve Gaines / Gary Witzgall4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Fuhrman / Norman Moore vs Dan Ostrander / Gary Thompson4-6, 3-6
2026-05-31vs Blankenship/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesDaniel Hayes / Jack Vandercook vs Glenn Kiger / J Dennis Covington4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Correll / Norman Moore vs Mike Bolds / Gary Witzgall4-6, 4-6
2026-05-17vs Blankenship/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Anderson / James Dahlstein vs Tony Lance / Dan Ostrander1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJack Vandercook / Daniel Hayes vs Robert Blankenship / John Rowenczak4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRob Rogers / Terry Correll vs Steve Gaines / Gary Witzgall4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men - Sunday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Daniel Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Roger Fuhrman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Jack Vandercook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Terry Correll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Norman Moore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
James Dahlstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Kerry Smyth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Hayes + Jack Vandercook224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Hayes
11W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
Roger Fuhrman
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Jack Vandercook
3W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Terry Correll
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
Norman Moore
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
James Dahlstein
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Kerry Smyth
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.