Teams

Taylor/55/3.5/NOD/MCC

2025 NO Adult 55 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 NO (55&O) Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-26vs Reed/55/3.5/NOD/ASTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelley Abbott / Jan Tolar vs Marilyn Foucheaux / Diane Triay2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Yarborough / Alissa Kantrow vs Elaine Waguespack / Laura Ramirez2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Rabin / Leslie Fawer vs Lisa Blount / Michelle Osborne2-6, 4-6
2025-03-19vs Petagna/55/3.5/NOD/NOLTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Taylor / Julie Valdes vs Marylou Freiberg / Renee Labadie7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Fawer / Lori Rodrigue vs Loraine Winsberg / Carlotta Fritchie7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiane Rabin / Mary Beth Rittiner vs Lisa Petagna / Joan Doyle4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-12vs Rosenthal/55/3.5/NOD/ASTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Taylor / Julie Valdes vs Judy Hendel / Margaret Davis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Fawer / Kelley Abbott vs Sandy Rosenthal / Celia Deininger6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Beth Rittiner / Diane Rabin vs Sue Knox / Catherine Lyman7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 NO (55&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Julie Valdes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Kelley Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Amy Maniscalco
published 3.5
Alissa Kantrow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Diane Rabin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Mary Beth Rittiner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Lisa Yarborough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Jennifer Rabalais
published
3.11
Jan Tolar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Leslie Fawer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Lori Rodrigue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Rittiner + Diane Rabin5258% games−0.2% vs expected
Leslie Fawer + Jan Tolar1739% games−9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Valdes
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Kelley Abbott
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Amy Maniscalco
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Alissa Kantrow
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Diane Rabin
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Mary Beth Rittiner
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Lisa Yarborough
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jennifer Rabalais
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jan Tolar
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Leslie Fawer
21W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lori Rodrigue
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.